It is one other version of “Trump’s Trials and Tribulations,” recorded on Thursday earlier than a dwell viewers of Lawfare Materials …
source
It is one other version of “Trump’s Trials and Tribulations,” recorded on Thursday earlier than a dwell viewers of Lawfare Materials …
source
Copyright © 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.
Copyright © 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.
Please learn to pronounce Oregon correctly. Otherwise, I adore you all especially Anna's commentaries.
Please learn to pronounce Nevada correctly. Otherwise, I adore you all.
The 14C3 case against Trump is completly frivilous regardless of whether the 14C3 applies to the President or not. Judge Luttig is right! The courts have it all wrong about 14C3 when comes to Trump. Everyone thinks because the Trump tried stop the Electoral Count Vote, he commited insurrection against the lawful authority against the United States. However, 14C3 says someone is disqualified if they engage in Insurrection against the US Constitution. From a historical prospective, Trump did no such thing.
You have to remember that 14C3 was made in response in the Civil War and it's primary intent was to keep Confederates out of public office. That being the case, those who were part of the Confederacy engaged in Insurrection against the US Constitution and were disqualified. Why??
Because Confederates had taken an oath to Support an ANTI-Constitution (A Constitution AGAINST the US Constiution) that being the The Confederate Constitution of Confederate State of American.
That was INSURRECTION they had commited.
For Trump to be disqualified, it would have be shown that Trump and his so-called followers SUPPORTED an ANTI-Constitution (The Constitution of Trump.) and when they violently breached the Capitol, there engaging in the furtherence of that Constitution.
The lawyers never made the argument that if Trump is the nominee, he can't be banished from the ballot because of his running mate (VP). Even if Trump disqualified, his running mate isn't (VP). You have to remember that Constitution says that if the President FAILS to qualify, the VP shall be President. So even if Trump is disqualified, he still can't be barred because his running mate would qualify to be the President.
What they are doing to Trump in Colorado is totally Unconstitutional. These judges need to read their own constitution:
From Colorado Constitution:
Bill of Rights:
Section 5. Freedom of elections. All elections shall be free and open; and no power,
civil or military, shall at any time interfere to prevent the free exercise of the right of suffrage.
Certainly BANISHING Trump from the Colorado's ballot by the Colorado Courts would most certainly be interfereing to PREVENT the right of suffrage for thousands of people in the State of Colorado.
This should frighten everyone. People have the RIGHT to vote for Donald Trump and Donald Trump has the RIGHT to be on the Colorado Ballot.
This kind of explains why State SOSs don't have the power to Banish people from the ballot.
SCOTUS is most certain to REVERSE should Trump be disqualified by the Colorado Supreme Court.
Even Eugene Debbs was allowed on the ballot and he was in jail convicted of sedition.
Banishing someone from the ballot is a big big big big big big big big big deal.
That's why it's a poticial question. The question of Presidental eligiblity is for Congress to answer not the courts.
The RIGHT to VOTE is even more important then the right to bear arms (2nd Amendment.)
The State of Colorado is trying to take your RIGHT to VOTE away!