Rachel Maddow, Lawrence O’Donnell and Chris Hayes focus on what occurs now that the federal appeals courtroom has denied …
source
Rachel Maddow, Lawrence O’Donnell and Chris Hayes focus on what occurs now that the federal appeals courtroom has denied …
source
The Supreme Court. Needs to do the right thing. Friend or not appointed by who If it wasn’t trump and it was jones who did what trump did how would they decide then?
What is taking them so long for
Trump talks utter drivel! The Supreme Court could disqualify him!
Members of Congress need to be prosecuted for thier connection to Putin.
Trump is already trying to prosecute Joe Biden and he's been doing it through maga Republicans!
HOW DID WE GET HERE?!
Well if another president breaks the law- then they too will be prosecuted! Dah
This is defamation. Im suing.
Make justice great again. Convict trump.
Trump's love for the dictatorships of the world, for the luxury in which they live and the submissiveness with which their subjects treat them, all of this Trump sees realized in leaders like Xi. He wants to be like them and along the way get rid of democracy, which he considers to be the weak form of government.
Xi was able to achieve the fact that Trump serves Chinese interests and weakens the USA because he confuses vassalage with a sign of his own strength with a single dinner in a Beijing gold hall. The sell-out of the American superpower was so cheap.
Anyone else ever notice that Lawrence O'Donnel looks like the actor who played Niles Crane? I keep expecting him to throw a joke in.
Since USA Indepence, there is no US President who had been prosecuted after leaving Office except THE LoSER AND CRMINAL TRUMP who is facing not ONE BUT FOUR Criminal Indictments with 91 Felons. Why is it involving Trump because HE HAS BEEN A GRIFTER AND LIAR HIS ENTIRE LIFE..
Biden should rethink his stripping Trump of his immunity. That gave Garland the power to weoponize the justice against Trump. Because Bobulinski isn't going away.
It occurrs to me that Joe could send Seal Team 6 to the SCOTUS too ya know.
Or are they afraid of trump, like the republican party?
All the supreme court has to do is follow the constitution
ANYONE WHO ENABLES A CRIMINAL TO COMMIT CRIMES IS AN ENABLER AND ACCOMPLISE TO ALL OF THE CRIMES COMMITTED BECAUSE OF BIDEN'S ALLOWING IT TO HAPPEN FOR THREE YEARS NOW.!!! WHY IN THREE YEARS BIDEN HAS NOT STOPPED THE PERVERSION GOING ON IN OUR SCHOOLS.!!!???
Trump said he's going to prostitute everybody that goes against him especially broadcasters from news companies he's going to put them all in prison and they will not get out underneath his watch
Trump SAID he will DO AWAY, REMOVE THE CONSTITUTION. So ehy foes he even NEED A Supreme Court? DICTATORS ARE THE LAW. Look around the globe. Look at history of dictators.
S
Trump's ridiculous statement is disproven by history to this point.
The news caster that looks like a man and the new COMMUNIST NEWS NETWORK
Here's the kicker. If (it's a big if) they say he (and all presidents) had/have absolute immunity, Trump may no longer be an issue as "Seal Team Six", currently takes orders from Biden.
They are not on Mt. Olympus.
You top the Most Sat- nict network brodcasting company. Be neutral pls.
Trump just wants them to delay their decision as long as possible. Same game plan as always.
It is unbelievable that this issue of absolute immunity is even being considered. It is ridiculous and should be kicked out by the Supreme Court.
Presidents do not have 100% immunity everyone knows that the Supreme Court should stick with the appeals court ruling
Problem is Maga is being paid by Russia and china.
How can people watch these Trump hatin ignorant,know nothing,TDS,woke liars.
Whenever Trump opens his mouth only stupid interpretations of law are made, and total ignorance of US government is displayed. He's an ignoramus of the highest order. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court is just as ignorant, and afraid of Trump and his MAGA'ts.
—- < The ruling by the DC Court of Appeals was specific to Trump's case and it should stand. According to U.S. v Nixon (1974), 418 U.S. 683. page 418 U. S. 706.707 and 715-716, .a sitting President does not have immunity from indictment or Judicial review and can be charged and prosecuted for crimes.
…. Deference for Article II duties was about the protection of sensitive materials, communications with foreign political leaders, material related to the performance of a Presidents legitimate Article II duties, and the protection of presidential records …. NOT about President's right to immunity against prosecution for criminal activities.