Legal professional Jeff Lewis joins “Forbes Newsroom” to debate the upcoming Supreme Court docket case during which former President Trump’s …
source
Legal professional Jeff Lewis joins “Forbes Newsroom” to debate the upcoming Supreme Court docket case during which former President Trump’s …
source
Copyright © 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.
Copyright © 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.
yea, this guy didnt say anything we dont already know
All of us know what it means but should it be enforced is the drawback
Everything the democrats say is about disinformation or misinformation that are actually true but they keep lying
Supreme court needs to decide if trump should be on the ballot, like they claiming it a federal government issue other words the federal government should have to taken care of this so the states would have to do their job.
Useless diatribe here.
We dont wantTrump , we dont want a dictator for a president…. Nor do we need his thug out on the streets.
Supreme court judges are another bunch of cowards. Remember their names; together with the orange Don, they will go down in history as responsible for the end of democracy in America.
The live hearing yesterday took on a surreal tone for me, as lawyers thought it would be effective to frequently repeat the fantasy that Trump had been found guilty of leading an insurrection.
I pray when Trump picks new judges, he doesn’t pick anyone from the Ivy League schools or California. They’ve all been indoctrinated
Dont agree with you
The Dems are so afraid of Trump they have attacked the guy with everything. I will vote for him for sure. If the Dems hate him that much he must be great!
Lose-lose situation is when Roberts pretend to be chief justice , but is 8-1loser, just because he hates the guts of Trump.
Turkeys on the screen pretending they can argue against USSC justices rulings . Get Lost.
I will never vote again trump2024❤
God bless president Trump 🙏
Biden will win by SCOTUS decision Enjoy your liberalism . God bless America and it SCOTUS.
Trump has not been convicted of resurrection how can he be banned from any ballot
TRUMP2024/FJB
So this is the Left wing of Forbes?
Unfortunately for the libs, this case has never been adjudicated by the courts and had a conviction. In fact, Congress who holds the power of deciding Presidential matters, has already acquitted him during impeachment. It was a Hail Mary at best for the corrupt left. Our Constitution is designed to protect federal title holders from 50 separate state lawsuits while executing their duties in office. If SCOTUS rules against President Trump, expect every GOP majority state to bounce Biden for Treason and not protecting the Southern Border.
MR.TRUMP DOESN'T DESERVE ANY BAD TREATMENT. NOT FROM ANY COURT.TRUMP 2024.
Presidents are elected not appointed
"let's keep this conversation going" signals the end of the interview
Please stop addressing citizen Donald Trump as “President.”
Lawyers are focused on winning or losing the case before the Supreme Court based only on the facts of his inciting or being a part of the insurrection, or whether or not he was an officer of the government. But put all that aside and look at the clause that says, "giving aid and comfort to the insurrectionists is enough to disqualify someone for running for the presidency." Trump did that and continues to do so now. Why doesn't that get brought up in all of these discussions by the experts lawyers? It is a major part of the 14th amendment and that standing alone is enough to disqualify him.
This John Roberts Scorus is sold to the democrats and for the ruin of our Nation.
Appellate courts make decisions of law. The finder of facts is a jury. This appellate court found Trump guilty of a crime without due process. Trump has not been found guilty of insurrection. The appellate court of Colorado should be ashamed of themselves.
There's no "waning trust" in the supreme court. This is a narrative manufactured by the left because the court is now dominated by conservative justices. There's no more distrust than when it was dominated by liberal judges. The only difference is in which side is dissatisfied with their rulings. What I hope comes out of this case more than anything is an assertion of the constitutional right to due process as guaranteed by the 5th, 6th, and even the 14th amendment which is the part of the constitution cited to justify keeping Trump off the ballot. Are we now at a point where it is no longer necessary to be proven guilty in court, but rather just summarily kicked off a ballot because a judge says you are guilty without any right to confront whatever evidence that judge, or worse yet a secretary of state, thinks makes them guilty? If this is allowed, there's nothing to stop this from happening to any candidate for any office from any party at any time. Just say they committed treason, no proof necessary, and boot them off the ballot. "But they're innocent" defenders will protest. Nope the secretary of state says you're a traitor and that's all the proof we need.
Supreme better consider taking Colorado superior courtdecission concerning trump seriously and over turn it for our sake, for safety and prosperity of America and to make all the world safer. Only TRUMP CAN DO IT
What B S
Jhon robert is a lying dem every one no it if he was a dem this would not be at all dem they no law for dem every one no how crook dem or
The Supreme Court has been faced with situations like this before. Brown vs Board of Education a case that had profound social and political consequences. CHief Justice Earl Warren guided the Court to a 9-0 decision. Starting with only 4 or 5 that even wanted to overturn Plessy, he managed to get all of them on board even thought the Constitutional basis was weak. I predict Roberts will do the same and Trump will lose 9-0. I do think though that each State will determine Trump's eligibility for themselves based on their own Election laws.
Colorado does not have grounds on the 14th Amendment for it is Congress job to do so by law! (Section 5)
"Go Peacefully and Patriotically let your voices be heard!" is First Amendment. Trump did not tell them to enter the Capitol, Ray Epps did!
We are a Republic, not a democracy. The difference is that a Republic is ruled by laws, and a democracy is ruled by feelings.
Disqualify him Now.😂😂😂
Trump would have to be tried by a jury and convicted of an insurrection before he could rightfully be taken off a ballot for insurrection. He has not yet been formally tried and convicted of that. The FBI said that there was no insurrection on January 6th. Plus the U.S. Senate already tried Trump and aquitted him of insurrection.
Omg. The voice is 2 octaves too high…. 😢
Their decision best be completely based on the constitution of the United States of America. Nothing else. The Supreme Court is not the law of the USA , the Constitution is. John Roberts will do all he can to please Rich people. He is human and his ego is way greater than his consciousness of God. A majority people please. A Supreme court justice should not be a people pleaser. But A person of law , The constitution is the law of the Americas. Before that is God's law.
Question?? What court found Trump guilty on creating an insurrection? But if we want to have banana republic style elections by removing favourable candidates, then go for it, lets just destroy our country with a one party will rule agenda. They choose who you cannot vote for.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-719/299349/20240131123116903_23-719%20-%20Amicus%20Brief.pdf
This legal expert (see Brief) believes that nonviolent attempts to seize power are covered by the requirements of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. He argues that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment applies to Trump because, according to the legal expert, Trump attempted to setting up fake electors.
According to this legal expert, the term "rebellion" includes a nonviolent (unconstitutional) attempt to seize power.
If the SCOTUS sides with Trump then they are reneging on their oath of office regarding supporting the US Constitution and are liable for impeachment, imprisonment for aiding and abetting a domestic terrorist in Trump who galvanized the Jan 6 attack and siege of the US CAPITOL!
This is another way the Democrats are trying to cheat on an election.
This is Communism People ‼️Taken TRUMP off any ballot or any political candidate is Communism.
TRUMP NOW🇺🇸MAGA 🇺🇸
This lawyer has no merit because he only states half-truths.
Some people who say that they are for the constitution are only for democracy when it suits them but when they have given it up for trump they will find he is a Putin want to be.
Trump 2o24
There was NO Insurrection ..its All B.S., . they ( Socialist Democratic and Swamp) know that they will be going down to GITMO for being a Traitor to America…
Roberts is not institutional,,he is constitutional and that is a very different animal.. disagreement with SCOTUS shouldn't be confused with distrust.