Beginning this Thursday by means of April, we’re within the midst of the MOST HISTORIC time period within the historical past of the USA Supreme …
source
Beginning this Thursday by means of April, we’re within the midst of the MOST HISTORIC time period within the historical past of the USA Supreme …
source
Copyright © 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.
Copyright © 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.
Will the Supreme Court surprise us and do the right things ?
SCOTUS will close the casket lid on the USA to protect their pay offs.
A m e r i c a n , C a e s a r . 📯🦅 🇺🇲
Never charged with insurrection … So No he can not be charged .. he was never charged to began with..
The Supreme Court needs to follow the Constitution. Democracy of the Supreme Court is in there hands
Listening to you liberals whining and pouting is music to my ears 😂😂! Trump still winning clowns!
"Why didn't they put the word president in the very enumerated list in Section 3?" Brown asked Murray."
Probably because the President and the Vice President where covered under "Officers of the United States "unlike all of the others who weren't officers.
The rest where enumerated because the didn't fall into a generalized category such as "Officers of the United States."
Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, aren't "Officers of the United States," ….a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, isn't an "officer of the United States."
READ… the Text it makes perfect sense, and ALL are included by their own status. Those Outside of the generalized officers, would need their particular status enumerated.
If justice Thomas took illegal gifts (bribes?) shouldn't he be brought up on charges? Where's the laws that protect this country from those on the benches that do illegal acts?
It's a goddamn shame that those SCROTUS justices can't be charged with OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE for their worship of Donald Trumptrash! 👿💩
Well how come they ain't got rid of a hunter and Biden
Enron destroyed the lives of its workers. It forced them to put their retirement funds into Enron, and destroyed them.
Donald Dump👌
The judgment will be stunning. The insurrection began before Jan 6. It started when Trump directly attempted to strong arm local election officials.
I love how in MAGA and Trump's mind, Biden is this doddering old dementia-ridden fool who is barely aware of his own surroundings and can't even find his way off a stage WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY he IS ALSO this SAVVY KINGPIN MASTERMIND who is covertly 'WEAPONIZING THE DOJ' and is SO CLEVER AND NEFARIOUS that he's able to COVERUP all evidence of himself ever doing so.
Watch MAGA and Trump WHINE like crazy about how 'disloyal' SCOTUS is when they rule against him.
DUDE–you DOXXED these people and your followers THREATENED THEIR LIVES before they even decided anything and you WONDER WHY they're not GUNG-HO for you??
Lol. You Dems are complete nut jobs. The guy did not commit nor was he convicted of being involved in any insurrection. Just because you hate somebody doesn't mean he's guilty.
NCFr left all their People high and dry . Dayton Ohio.
I dont understand what the second case u discuss is…
Oh no! The Supreme Court has to weigh in (on immunity)?Youre killin me.
What will it be Mr. Chief Justice? Will you compete with Chief Justice Taney for the worst Chief Justice or will you deliver a Decision based on Fact and Law? Mr. Trump is not deserving of any respect and if the Integrity of the Court is to be confirmed then You and the Associate Justices must Vote to Deny any privilege. History is Watching!
O my words
America us at war with ballots
It appears no one trust anyone
Whoops did this to jesus
Whoops said?
We believe Trump can do this. The democrats.hides too.much
We know how Thomas will vote. He is a political hack
The doom and gloom continues with Trump and his maga sickos.
All excuses and garbage end up the same place circular file.
All losses with great magnitude.
Biden should be disappointed that he hasn't done enough to "persuade" the Judges to rule against Trump. Same goes for Hailey as well.
Keep up the good work
TRUMP. IS NOTHING. BUT AN EX. PRESIDENT. An EVERY. DAY PERSON. LIKE. YOU. AND ME. CAN HAVE THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE. DO HIS. BIDDING?????????????????????? HE IS A. DISGRACED. EX- PRESIDENT
Those creeps were rewarded for sticking the knife in our democracy.
Horrible people.
It’s bigger than bush v gore – which was a scam. Imagine where the nation would be now if gore rightfully won: we’d have a green Infrastructure, no Iraq war, no tax giveaways to billionaires. It would be a better world by far.
"We cannot accept former President Trump’s claim that a President has unbounded authority to commit crimes that would neutralize the most fundamental check on executive power — the recognition and implementation of election results. Nor can we sanction his apparent contention that the Executive has carte blanche to violate the rights of individual citizens to vote and to have their votes count.
* * *
At bottom, former President Trump’s stance would collapse our system of separated powers by placing the President beyond the reach of all three Branches. Presidential immunity against federal indictment would mean that, as to the President, the Congress could not legislate, the Executive could not prosecute and the Judiciary could not review. We cannot accept that the office of the Presidency places its former occupants above the law for all time thereafter. Careful evaluation of these concerns leads us to conclude that there is no functional justification for immunizing former Presidents from federal prosecution in general or for immunizing former President Trump from the specific charges in the Indictment. In so holding, we act, 'not in derogation of the separation of powers, but to maintain their proper balance.' "
US Court of Appeals, Feb 6th, 2024