Friday, July 4, 2025
  • About us
  • Contact us
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub
  • Home
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos
Social icon element need JNews Essential plugin to be activated.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos
Social icon element need JNews Essential plugin to be activated.
No Result
View All Result
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub
No Result
View All Result

DC Circuit Court of Appeals Oral Argument: U.S. v. Trump

March 12, 2024
in Videos
Reading Time: 1 min read
A A
36



U.S. Court docket of Appeals for the DC Circuit Oral Argument: United States v. Trump, a case regarding whether or not former President …

source

Tags: 2nd amendment2nd amendment rights2nd amendment supreme court cases2nd amendment usAPPEALSArgumentC-SPANCIRCUITCOURTCSPANDC CircuitDonald Trumpfreedom of speechfreedom of speech us amendmentfreedom of speech us bill of rightsgun legality usgun legislationguns amendmentguns amendment constitutionguns america digestguns america legitJanuary 6Oralpreppers guidepreppers newsPresident of the United Statessecond amendmenttrumpU.S
Previous Post

SAF WINS SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN CAL. ONE GUN A MONTH CHALLENGE

Next Post

Trump-DeSantis censorship law has rough day at SCOTUS

Next Post
Trump-DeSantis censorship law has rough day at SCOTUS

Trump-DeSantis censorship law has rough day at SCOTUS

Is Foraging Legal? Understanding the Rules and Regulations

Is Foraging Legal? Understanding the Rules and Regulations

Bill O’Reilly: Legal cases against Trump unraveling | On Balance

Bill O'Reilly: Legal cases against Trump unraveling | On Balance

Comments 36

  1. @taramiesieski1705 says:
    1 year ago

    Talking so fast is making my head spin, it's making it impossible to listen to ,that voice is hurting my ears,I'd rather listen to my nails on a chalkboard!

    Reply
  2. @GaryFord-ib7oz says:
    1 year ago

    Judge pam commie idiot

    Reply
  3. @GaryFord-ib7oz says:
    1 year ago

    They dont care

    Reply
  4. @GaryFord-ib7oz says:
    1 year ago

    China plant pay off for democrats quid pro quoe

    Reply
  5. @GaryFord-ib7oz says:
    1 year ago

    Riged court

    Reply
  6. @bindiberry6280 says:
    1 year ago

    Why should supreme courts refuse to hear about election fraud cases that were widely discussed in 2020 ?
    We trusted that these courts and judges should not be protected by any laws any more.
    These judges stripped those kinds of protections themselves to all sides in our society already.

    Reply
  7. @ugodeclanuzor5821 says:
    1 year ago

    This is insane. This is not a fair trail. This is an accusatory trail.

    Reply
  8. @user-jq5we8rq4o says:
    1 year ago

    If the Supreme Court actually votes for the option that you must be impeached in order to be held accountable, I believe that it will be time for a serious March on Washington. It will enable trump to do whatever he wants and stop Biden from any ability to fight back. It is treason!

    Reply
  9. @Laura4p0 says:
    1 year ago

    Id like to say i feel sorry for Trump's attorneys having to try to argue these crazy legal arguments Trump probably came up with, but i like watching them panic way too much.

    Reply
  10. @brendahogan5779 says:
    1 year ago

    America is NOT A DEMOCRACY‼️ AMERICA IS A CONDITIONAL REPUBLIC‼️🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

    Reply
  11. @brendahogan5779 says:
    1 year ago

    These are Washington DC Judges, the whole Washington DC area hate President Trump! Why? Because he sees right through their games!!! He knows how to set up his own businesses, build beautiful buildings, for which he connects with the everyday citizens! He is a populist President!!!👏👏👏

    Reply
  12. @jvsvid123 says:
    1 year ago

    Trump is in so much trouble, this is the tip of the iceberg. defendant's argument has no rhyme or reason. Official act? The president is in service of the people, not a king . It lame lame-duck argument and this guy has never had accountability all his life.

    Reply
  13. @qsw-1228 says:
    1 year ago

    Well I know somebody needs a deep glass of water! 😩

    Reply
  14. @birdman1843 says:
    1 year ago

    Trump is above the law

    Reply
  15. @tonywong7992 says:
    1 year ago

    THIS IS BS

    Reply
  16. @billythekid9061 says:
    1 year ago

    Judge Pan is a very attract woman. Also intelligent it seems. Trumps lawyer is doing the best he can but the argument is insane.

    Reply
  17. @curtisgoss2669 says:
    1 year ago

    The bigger they come, the harder they fall. Will be interesting to see whether the hairy orange ball will bounce, plop like an egg in the frying pan, run like said egg, or shatter like a piece of china. Whichever, it needs to be to his total ruin. Justice and righteousness needs to rule supreme over the scofflaw, which is Donald daJohn tRump.

    Reply
  18. @robertmorrison886 says:
    1 year ago

    Looks like a bunch of freaks

    Reply
  19. @tommylucas8140 says:
    1 year ago

    Democrats desperately weoponizing the doj and fake news to attack their political opponents every day. They are traitors to this country and America is tired of the bullshit that's why they have the lowest approval rating in history.

    Reply
  20. @donaldwuerlmke says:
    1 year ago

    Obama never directed any drone strikes against any Americans anywhere on Earth.

    Reply
  21. @donaldwuerlmke says:
    1 year ago

    There is no such thing as Absolute Presidential Immunity.

    Reply
  22. @russelldavis2456 says:
    1 year ago

    I am shocked that a lawyer is allowed to say this at all.

    Reply
  23. @robertsaltzman2481 says:
    1 year ago

    Trump is correct judge… get over it

    Reply
  24. @robertsaltzman2481 says:
    1 year ago

    Every judge seems to be asking how can we judge Trump a criminal instead of how an American president is innocent until proven guilty

    Reply
  25. @sherrirussell9472 says:
    1 year ago

    The fact that I wonder what side the judge is on….tells me that our justice system is no longer the impartial body it should be. And why is this judge questioning the attorney about interpreting the law? Should she not already have an understanding and the knowledge to know what that law is and what can be done in her Court….this is not the road America should be traveling. And if the president incited insurrection., and I do not believe he did, he was still president, would not any (alleged) insurrection he incited be
    against himself?

    Reply
  26. @jollyranch8384 says:
    1 year ago

    He didn’t use the official twitter account for POTUS, he used his personal account so I think that shouldn’t be considered a Presidential Act.

    Reply
  27. @paigeprice4574 says:
    1 year ago

    People died, cops suffered life changing injuries, suicides followed. Official act my ass!

    Reply
  28. @bubbles0019 says:
    1 year ago

    Clearly 3 Activists debating in favour for Democrats, they will say and do whatever they can to deny Americans a President of their choice by destroying Donald Trump. What a disgusting time to be living in America, you Despicable people really are the Pits

    Reply
  29. @craigbromiley7837 says:
    1 year ago

    Dont cut him off judge Childs. You cut him off 10 times. So fucking rude.stop cutting him off. You are the rudest damn person. Just stop it.

    Reply
  30. @craigbromiley7837 says:
    1 year ago

    Ok , Pan is an absolute idiot.

    Reply
  31. @craigbromiley7837 says:
    1 year ago

    Judge Pan is dumb. Is she bought off by China.

    Reply
  32. @craigbromiley7837 says:
    1 year ago

    If the DC court of appeals doesnt unanimously come to the conclusion that the President Trump has absolute immunity, then they are corrupt as hell. And our country is in serious serios trouble.

    Reply
  33. @dimimegesis says:
    1 year ago

    murder under pressure is okay? but subverting elections is not? seems wrong.

    Reply
  34. @vernmalubay3191 says:
    1 year ago

    It’s not us vs trump it’s the non Americans against trump. TRUMP 2024🇺🇸

    Reply
  35. @dimimegesis says:
    1 year ago

    separation of powers? what about checks and balances?

    Reply
  36. @patrickseevers3858 says:
    1 year ago

    I can’t stand that Sauers voice

    Reply

Leave a Reply to @curtisgoss2669 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CATEGORIES

  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos
No Result
View All Result

LATEST UPDATES

  • LIVE: President Biden’s State of the Union address full coverage
  • Exploring The Pros And Cons Of Using Once Fired Brass And New Brass For Reloading
  • SAF BRIEF SUPPORTS SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION IN WAITING PERIOD CHALLENGE
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos

Copyright © 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.