Thursday, October 16, 2025
  • About us
  • Contact us
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub
  • Home
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos
Social icon element need JNews Essential plugin to be activated.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos
Social icon element need JNews Essential plugin to be activated.
No Result
View All Result
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub
No Result
View All Result

Illinois assault weapons ban: US Supreme Court refuses to block law

December 17, 2023
in Videos
Reading Time: 1 min read
A A
34



The Supreme Courtroom on Thursday declined to placed on maintain a brand new Illinois legislation that may ban high-power semiautomatic weapons …

source

Tags: 2nd amendment2nd amendment rights2nd amendment supreme court cases2nd amendment usassaultassault weaponsassault weapons banBanblockchicagoCOURTfreedom of speechfreedom of speech us amendmentfreedom of speech us bill of rightsgun legality usgun legislationguns amendmentguns amendment constitutionguns america digestguns america legitillinoisillinois supreme courtLawnewspreppers guidepreppers newsrefusessecond amendmentSupremevideoWeapons
Previous Post

Woman Says She Fired a Gun at Portland Airport Because She Wanted to Kill Her Texas Family Members

Next Post

Montana Gun Free School Zone Case, Metcalf has GPS Ankle Bracelet Removed

Next Post
Montana Gun Free School Zone Case, Metcalf has GPS Ankle Bracelet Removed

Montana Gun Free School Zone Case, Metcalf has GPS Ankle Bracelet Removed

Ohio House Speaker says there’s ‘not support’ for gun control legislation

Ohio House Speaker says there's 'not support' for gun control legislation

Second Amendment Foundation: Congressional Democrats attempting gun control is political posturing

Second Amendment Foundation: Congressional Democrats attempting gun control is political posturing

Comments 34

  1. @IksinskiTomek says:
    2 years ago

    ban don't prohibit the owners from possession !! You lie !!! Ban is only for new purchases. If you bought before ban you can keep it !!!! Don't spread bullshit !!!!

    Reply
  2. @foxxygranpa87 says:
    2 years ago

    Fun fact: In the US, there are about 300-400 rifle deaths per year. In that same timespan, there are 500-1000 deaths from autoerotic asphyxiation. More people die from jerking it than by the super scary AR 15.

    Reply
  3. @chanceweatherford9578 says:
    2 years ago

    So what are they going to do about all the criminals that already own an assault rifle? Do they think they get them all legally? 😂 they’re (police/government) trying to be the only ones with assault weapons? So how do we protect ourselves when police fail to be present 99% of the time lol? Glad I don’t live in Illinois they definitely do not care about their citizens well being at all. That’s been made apparent through years and years of gun violence already. But by all means take our constitutional rights


    Reply
  4. @darrelkennth9902 says:
    2 years ago

    Illegal immigration’s rises and no more ICE detention no protection from Biden’s illegal M13 gang members they’re allowed to carry AK47s and Biden arrest’s American citizens legally carrying a firearm for self defence

    Reply
  5. @mullhollandmace7271 says:
    2 years ago

    And you idiots voted for Pritzker TWICE !đŸ€ŁđŸ€Ł

    Reply
  6. @ericvulgate7091 says:
    2 years ago

    I do not recognize any authority that claims to speak for me.

    Reply
  7. @Mike-qu8bh says:
    2 years ago

    What happens to the rifles that people have put in pawn shops for loans?

    Reply
  8. @chuckst98 says:
    2 years ago

    That’s why I live in Florida!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  9. @davidpille3593 says:
    2 years ago

    Supreme Court is so fucking wishy-washy. Never know what they will do next

    Reply
  10. @12gaugedanny96 says:
    2 years ago

    “Oh no they’re putting bans on guns, I guess I gotta follow the laws
”

    -Not a single criminal, ever.

    Reply
  11. @michaelkobulnicky3399 says:
    2 years ago

    Never comply with these Communists!@@

    Reply
  12. @mysterjd34 says:
    2 years ago

    Seems like they should have put the hold on anyway. Allowing the states to violate constitutionality for any length of time isn't cool.

    Reply
  13. @DejaVu-iy8hh says:
    2 years ago

    Over these last three years, I have seen the liberals do more damage to this country than any gun ever thought of doing.

    Reply
  14. @betafishproductions8628 says:
    2 years ago

    And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?… The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If…if…We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation…. We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”

    ― Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956

    Reply
  15. @1off39 says:
    2 years ago

    No such thing as a ban , its your God given right . PERIOD

    Reply
  16. @rkba4923 says:
    2 years ago

    … for Due Process and Procedural reasons, and NOT on the MERITS OF THE CASE. It's an Interlocutory action. They want it to "percolate" up to them through the courts with a full judicial record. Otherwise, future wannabe tyrants could make an argument that they did not get FULL DUE PROCESS and, more easily, overturn their decision. This way it makes that much more difficult to do. Once this reaches the SC ON THE MERITS, it WILL be overturned pursuant to the SC's already established precedents in Heller I (2008), McDonald (2010), Caetano (2016) and NYSRPA (2022).

    Reply
  17. @Sheri77 says:
    2 years ago

    Yeah, just take your time… Biden only ushered in over 10 million unvetted illegals across our southern borders, we don't really know how many of those are terrorists… somebody can tell them they'll have to wait to attack.

    Reply
  18. @JTSGYM says:
    2 years ago

    Do NOT comply. This "law" in unconstitutional and our Founding Fathers made it clear what we are to do if the government fails to defend the constitution and our freedoms.

    A state cannot effectively enforce unconstitutional laws if millions refuse to comply. It's not possible to arrest millions. For instance, the state economy cannot sustain that much loss in the work force or consumers. The court system cannot handle millions of cases. The jails cannot hold millions of new suspects. etc. There's no realistic option for the state if everyone simply refuses to comply.

    Reply
  19. @henry6451 says:
    2 years ago

    Hard to believe a sane gun decision in the US.

    Reply
  20. @thomasengebretson6703 says:
    2 years ago

    This seems unconstitutional. The 2nd amendment protects the right to have guns to defend yourself against a tyrannical government. Hunting and self-defense are other uses beyond the original. Limiting one side to a single shot is a real advantage

    Reply
  21. @paninipimp says:
    2 years ago

    A lot of people commenting love guns more than they love people.

    Reply
  22. @gracefaith6699 says:
    2 years ago

    Sounds like Nazi Germany for you, Illinois people.

    Reply
  23. @wesjohnson6215 says:
    2 years ago

    No

    Reply
  24. @Shocker12333 says:
    2 years ago

    Lmaooo the uneducated gun owners forgetting that the down south inbreeding states still have the highest crime andddd lowest quality of lifeđŸ˜‚â˜ ïž what are you touting here? That your party and states suck?!😂

    Reply
  25. @weebnoob4973 says:
    2 years ago

    Imagine telling people they can’t have semiautomatic rifles while you’re probably protected at your estate by semiautomatic rifles.

    Reply
  26. @rodbonjovi says:
    2 years ago

    no It is NOT!! CONSTITUTIONAL IT IS OVERREACH PAID FOR BY THE bOUGHT AND PAID FOR ill sUPREME cOURT BY BILLIONAIRES

    Reply
  27. @kevintipton2989 says:
    2 years ago

    A Civic war will be horrible! I guess it starts in Illinois!

    Reply
  28. @user-yq2un4ku1f says:
    2 years ago

    Don't comply to these laws

    Reply
  29. @captaincapitalism264 says:
    2 years ago

    The REGISTERING of such guns/items, is what is unconstitutional, let alone other factors. No matter that other states have enacted registration too; they are also unconstitutional. Unless we want to become like Saddam Hussein's era of Iraq, when even typewriters had to be registered with the government…i.e., would you accept govt registration requirements on every device you use to exercise your First Amendment rights…?

    Reply
  30. @lauran6184 says:
    2 years ago

    They tried this in some other state recently. Something like .01% complied. 😂

    Reply
  31. @joshvice8376 says:
    2 years ago

    How many horrific crimes against civilization does it take to strip them of their inalienable right and liberty?
    We'll have that data soon.

    Reply
  32. @emojicursed says:
    2 years ago

    Taken away our rights 1 at a time slowly but surely we will no longer be free in this country already happening now!!

    Reply
  33. @willmont8258 says:
    2 years ago

    And the dumbest thing about these bans is to make illegal the gun if the LCM is banned too. The AR-15 is the same thing as any other semi-auto rifle, and if 10 rounds is the mag limit, then it makes no difference whether the bullet is fired from the AR or any other semi-auto rifle.

    Reply
  34. @Deestroyer_ says:
    2 years ago

    WE WILL NOT COMPLY.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CATEGORIES

  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos
No Result
View All Result

LATEST UPDATES

  • LIVE: President Biden’s State of the Union address full coverage
  • Exploring The Pros And Cons Of Using Once Fired Brass And New Brass For Reloading
  • SAF BRIEF SUPPORTS SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION IN WAITING PERIOD CHALLENGE
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos

Copyright © 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.