SC 9 Judges LIVE, CJI Chandrachud Day-6 #supremecourt #lawchakra #regulation #supremecourtofindia#lawchakra Go to Our …
source
SC 9 Judges LIVE, CJI Chandrachud Day-6 #supremecourt #lawchakra #regulation #supremecourtofindia#lawchakra Go to Our …
source
Copyright © 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.
Copyright © 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.
Meaning of mineral for the purpose of the MM(RD) Act, 1948 and MM(DR) Act, 1957 is different than it has the meaning under the other statutes and in common perception.
Provisions in Entry 23 of List II in Seventh Schedule are for the minerals under the MM (RD) Act, 1948 and the MM (DR) Act, 1957 whereas provisions under Entry 50 were made for the minerals other than specified for providing regulation and development under control of the Union.
Entry 50 in List II was provided considering provisions and restrictions provided for the minor minerals under the MM RD Act,1948 and for the specified minor minerals under the MM DR Act,1957 and after 1972 it was denuded by the parliament.
Royalty upon minerals in hindi called as स्वामिस्व means a share for the ownership and therefore it could not be treated as the tax.
It is important to be noted that MM (DR) Act, 1957 is a statute to provide development of minerals and regulation of mine for those minerals which are specified under the statute as a minerals vest in Government.
The provisions under Entry 50 under list II of the Seventh Schedule are provised for such minerals which are not specified under the MM DR Act in terms of the minerals vest in Government.
In hindi royalty is called स्वम्मिस means contribution/share for the ownership and therefore the powers for leving taxes on minerals under entry 50 could not be implied for prescribing royalty upon such minerals which vest in Government for providing regulation and development by the Union.
Provisions under Entry 50 of List II in to the Constitution of India was provided after considering provisions made under the MCR, 1949 for minor minerals and now it has no any such meaning as now the minor minerals are declared as the minerals vest in private persons.
Good better best
This man (Cji) can save only our great democracy,i am proud for this man ,he is truly a great person with a strong spine,love you sir❤❤❤
CJI jindabad
CJI DY Chandra Chud ji Namaste. Pls stop this CAA. This is not good for Muslims n. Others. Pls. Don't Afraid humanbeing because God every time with you n my prayer . JOAN.
Some of the responses from Judiary apparently not credible.Unfortunate.
The hearing on elections by paper ballots is looming in SC.The EVM matter is the most crucial factor. The Supreme Court has to put this Ginni of EVM back in the bottle.
Very respectable cji till now
Wow…it's really fantastic to know only Judiciary now is genuine out of four pillars of Democracy, i.e. Legislative, Executive, Judiciary and Journalism.
Yekisbaatparcharchahorahihai
Respected sir
Ban Evm sir
While 12 crore cases of janata are rottening,here for one Politicians case 9 highly experienced judjes paid by janata are working on one case unrelated to janata A COLOSSAL LOSS OF MANHOURS & PUBLIC MONEY
After 75 years of independent India, the executive and the judiciary are still trying to sort out taxing on mines and minerals… Why so long, or we just realized it?
Only cji hon'ble chandra chid
Jay ho
5:55:49
Names of honorable judges are not visible. Speaking Advocates should say their name before speaking so it gets recorded. Their name should be placed on the podium as long as they speak for the benefit of viewers.
only supreme court can fight against the dictatorship in any tens
It’s S.court of India but why can’t they have 2 national flags on either end? Whole world is watching.
"States cannot impose tax on mineral rights as this relates to mineral development on which any law to be framed is exclusively reserved for the Centre, argued mining companies in Supreme Court. The nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court is deciding the validity of state laws imposing tax related to mineral rights."