Friday, July 4, 2025
  • About us
  • Contact us
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub
  • Home
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos
Social icon element need JNews Essential plugin to be activated.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos
Social icon element need JNews Essential plugin to be activated.
No Result
View All Result
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub
No Result
View All Result

Michigan secretary of state reacts to Supreme Court arguments in Trump ballot case

February 27, 2024
in Videos
Reading Time: 1 min read
A A
31



Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson was on the Supreme Court docket as arguments had been revamped whether or not Donald Trump is …

source

Tags: 2024 election2nd amendment2nd amendment rights2nd amendment supreme court cases2nd amendment usargumentsballotcasecoloradoCOURTDonald TrumpEligibilityfreedom of speechfreedom of speech us amendmentfreedom of speech us bill of rightsgun legality usgun legislationguns amendmentguns amendment constitutionguns america digestguns america legitJocelyn BensonMichiganPoliticspreppers guidepreppers newspresidential electionReactsscotussecond amendmentSecretarySecretary of StateStateSupremesupreme courttrumptrump ballot eligibilityu.s. politics
Previous Post

Democracy on Trial (full documentary) | FRONTLINE

Next Post

The Supreme Court Will Determine Trump’s Future

Next Post
The Supreme Court Will Determine Trump’s Future

The Supreme Court Will Determine Trump's Future

100 Important Supreme Court Judgments Of 2023 – PART-2

100 Important Supreme Court Judgments Of 2023 - PART-2

Do You (Really) Need a New Gun?

Do You (Really) Need a New Gun?

Comments 31

  1. @craigmitchell2828 says:
    1 year ago

    Traitor

    Reply
  2. @jimmyezekias6281 says:
    1 year ago

    Trump 2024!!!

    Reply
  3. @latscott says:
    1 year ago

    It's better decided by the people of the good old USA, and not the States by themselves …

    Reply
  4. @nickmyrvold1343 says:
    1 year ago

    Dems all over will act semi normal as the election year plays out.

    Reply
  5. @paulao7022 says:
    1 year ago

    This case, is important. This case, will set a precedence. In the future cases.

    Reply
  6. @rustynails68 says:
    1 year ago

    The constitution needs a process for disqualification, and a 60 senator requirement for a supreme court confirmation.

    Reply
  7. @rayanna348 says:
    1 year ago

    Free and Fair, Joke 😮

    Reply
  8. @byLizzDevine says:
    1 year ago

    Nevada Wouldn't Place Mr Trump on the ballot, is that the Same ?
    Nevada held two separate Primaries , Is That The Same ?

    Reply
  9. @byLizzDevine says:
    1 year ago

    WoW I just read This , what does this mean ?
    Malcolm Turnbull describes his infamous 
    call with Donald Trump over Australia's refugee swap deal as TOUGH
    When did this happen? I can't find it

    Reply
  10. @BartBrophy says:
    1 year ago

    What’s needed for the Feds to decide Trumps an insurrectionist? And should be barred from running?

    Reply
  11. @citizen5700 says:
    1 year ago

    so does that mean Putin can be a republican and run for office?

    Reply
  12. @Robert-fv3vn says:
    1 year ago

    Trump is a traitor.

    Reply
  13. @annaponie says:
    1 year ago

    Go President Trump you are our hero
    Americans United for a real strong leader 💪💪💪

    Reply
  14. @JM21999 says:
    1 year ago

    Fair and secure elections lol where did I hear that before

    Reply
  15. @watchit6298 says:
    1 year ago

    Clarence Thomas should have recused himself!😡😡😡😡😡

    Reply
  16. @charlesjolly5169 says:
    1 year ago

    Even the Dem SC Justices laughed at Colorado.I would be embarrassed to live with NAZIs representing state law like Colorado.

    Reply
  17. @bobbysmith270 says:
    1 year ago

    CBS is almost as fake as CNN be careful when you watch fake news only honest about 20% of the time God Bless Everyone

    Reply
  18. @obxconsumer9281 says:
    1 year ago

    Professors Blight and Faust- could you and MSNBC make your positions public on Qualified And Absolute Immunity and if you believe this SCOTUS ruling violates the US Const. because it gives immunity from const. violations to local,state, and federal government officials??? WHY didn't you support In Re Daniel Felix, US Sup Ct. case no. 22-7152-this case makes the argument that the entire court system is committing a "pattern and practice" of const. rights violations by throwing out valid claims with FRCP Rule 12 (b)(6) and Qualified And Absolute Immunity and keeping the American People from participating in the formation of case law by letting their claims against const. violators go forward to published cases? There is an argument here that the discrimination and prejudices of SCOTUS's past rulings keep being brought forward into new cases then the Court refuses to let new issues of law be litigated and thus published that reflect the way things are now and how the American People feel now. In Re Daniel Felix brought this and never before heard animal rights issues which comply with Rule 20 US SUP Ct where no case law exists for any lower court and the Justices passed on creating case law which violated their own rules and the US Const.-why hasn't that hypocrisy been addressed by the media or the Court? Why does D. Trump have const. rights but Daniel Felix and his animals do not? With this Court's discrimination the government chooses who does and who does not have constitutional rights-how is that what our Founding Fathers wrote the const. to mean. Both of you just said that the plain language of the const. means the const. applies to everyone, so how come you advocate for Qualified And Absolute Immunity or throwing out any case by putting the court rules (Rule 12(b)(6)) above the US Const. and keeping the const. violators in office with no way for the American People to hold them accountable. [ don't even suggest the FBI nor USDOJ are protecting us they ignore us] Having anyone in government immune from the US Const. is the opposite of why the US Const. was written! It seems you advocate for this hypocrisy when it suits your position-will you comment on this?

    Reply
  19. @jemes502 says:
    1 year ago

    There is a reason the michigan population hasn't grown in over 20 years…this is one reason

    Reply
  20. @conversationswithme8601 says:
    1 year ago

    Stay away from Demons! 😮

    Reply
  21. @giovannisoave9634 says:
    1 year ago

    We all know that the supreme court is going to protect the insurrectionist. What a disgrace!

    Reply
  22. @georgbot6966 says:
    1 year ago

    Thanks Colorado and L Dems for wasting time and money 😮

    Reply
  23. @Flumazenil says:
    1 year ago

    Colorado will just pass a law that anyone with the initials DJT cannot run for office.

    Reply
  24. @Flumazenil says:
    1 year ago

    Chinese Broadcasting System
    Just propaganda.

    Reply
  25. @timothyshiu2263 says:
    1 year ago

    It was known for years
    “In God we trust, so help us God.”
    But it is clear nowadays
    “In Gold we trust, so buy us Gold.”
    And people don’t want poverty and head towards the sounds of money even they won’t get any

    Reply
  26. @axeguy85 says:
    1 year ago

    SCOTUS turned their back on textualism. Sorry, Ghost of Scalia.

    Reply
  27. @WASD282 says:
    1 year ago

    Lets say its self executing. And it doesnt need a conviction. Who determines it? What happens when people say dems supported chaz, which put up a sign saying "now leaving usa" was heavily armed and declared itself an autonomous zone even establishing a general assembly government and disqualify them? It shouldnt matter if you are republican or democrat, biden and trump will be gone in 4 years, the precedent this sets will be dangerous forever. Think people, this shouldnt even be a question. Its an opportunity to disqualify anyone you disagree with for vague reasons.

    Reply
  28. @wesleyc.4937 says:
    1 year ago

    If they're having such a hard time figuring out who should decide what, imagine how hard it will be when it comes time to enforce what they decided.

    Reply
  29. @HelmetVanga says:
    1 year ago

    The damage is already done. GOP presidential hopeful can not count with GA 14 electoral votes next Nov. Desperately asking, I need 8k votes give me a break.. is that how you win an election?

    Reply
  30. @SkatingErinsMom says:
    1 year ago

    Let's not forget the issue in some states where, on voting day, African-Americans are forced to wait in day-long lines, are refused water or food, voting hours restricted, etc… Isn't that a very important that must be solved? Yes! Is there any coordinated, high priority effort placed on fixing this issue?

    Reply
  31. @snowrose101 says:
    1 year ago

    The area SCOTUS seems to be focused on is how to deal with disenfranchising voters if a state chooses to drop Trump – but this is already an issue states are accepting. Twenty- seven states already don't allow felons to vote and/or run for office, and almost no one is worrying about being disenfranchised in that way. The states have already accepted the responsibility.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CATEGORIES

  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos
No Result
View All Result

LATEST UPDATES

  • LIVE: President Biden’s State of the Union address full coverage
  • Exploring The Pros And Cons Of Using Once Fired Brass And New Brass For Reloading
  • SAF BRIEF SUPPORTS SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION IN WAITING PERIOD CHALLENGE
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos

Copyright © 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.