The Supreme Courtroom heard oral arguments Thursday over whether or not Colorado can take away Donald Trump from the state’s major …
source
The Supreme Courtroom heard oral arguments Thursday over whether or not Colorado can take away Donald Trump from the state’s major …
source
Copyright © 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.
Copyright © 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.
What happen to America is a shame for so many border immigrants filled up ill city and shelter in lligel because Biden wasn't cheep labor and in lligel voters for the democrats only
You are a liar. Trump told the protesters to remain peaceful. It was the last tweet he made before then-Communist Twitter banned his account. You said Trump did nothing to dissuade the riot, which is a lie. But you're CBS news. Lying is what you do.
If you are going to try to remove a candidate because of an insurrection you may want to charge him with insurrection first. Trump has never been charged with insurrection. Once again the Biden DOJ is nothing but a fascist political tool. It will be a 9-0 decision.
Just to correct the accuracy of your reporting. Norma is not a Republican. Norma is a Republican In Name Only. Otherwise known as the Rhinos we hear about.
There's was no insurrection. A set up, yes!
Did we hear the same hearing???? It isn't going well for the left!
Yet when the SCOTUS ruled to over-turn Roe V Wade they turned it back for each state to make decisions regarding what a woman can and can't do with her own body !!!!!👿
Federalist Papers, No 72, Hamilton, 1778, addressing positive and negative arguments of limiting the term of an Executive Officer: "a man of irregular ambition, of whom alone there could be reason in any case to entertain apprehensions, would with infinite reluctance yield to the necessity of taking his leave forever of a post, in which his passion for power and pre-eminence had acquired the force of habit. And if he had been fortunate or adroit enough to conciliate the good will of people he might induce them to consider as a very odious and unjustifiable restraint upon themselves, a provision which was calculated to debar them of the right of giving a fresh proof of their attachment to a favorite. There may be conceived circumstances, in which this disgust of the people, seconding the thwarted ambition of such a favourite, might occasion greater danger to liberty, than could ever reasonably be dreaded from the possibility of a perpetuation in office, by the voluntary suffrages of the community, exercising a constitutional privilege.
There is an excess of refinement in the idea of disabling the people to continue in office men, who had entitled themselves, in their opinion, to approbation and confidence; the advantages of which are at best speculative and equivocal; and are over-balanced by disadvantages far more certain and decisive."
Can a murderer run for office and have the choice of letting the voters decide?
If a dem attacks the capital , they could be removed just the same, that was a silly argument?
Should we let a cult attack the capital building and disrupt an election get away with it? And let the leader of the cult continue to try to upset our government ? Inviting others to try the same? Recruiting cult members in plain daylight?
This case should be a 9-0 slam dunk. The CO Sec of State had no right to act as judge,jury & executionaer, convicting & disqualifying Trump on a charge he was never indicted on. The CO court's ruling was unconstitutional since even if Trump was convicted of insurrection, it's Congress not an individual state that would disqualify him.
Donald Trump will win. Because he is a man of the People.
Every partisan has an opinion, much of it shaped by media propaganda like on this channel. That is not looking at the true law. Man was never charged with "insurrection". He was never a civil war officer. Libs bend facts to their political convenience..
What a crock Here in the free world we need Trump back
Is there anyone really that dumb to believe someone engaged in insurrection to overturn himself from the power? who is POTUS on 6 Jan 2021?
#Trump2024 , God decides
Silly premises!But yes anyone citing an insurrection can be banned.Is that a problem? Isn’t that the way it should be?
So …16 yr.olds or Russian born citizens CAN run for office ?
The buzzwords from the right are getting tired—- Willy-nilly… Pandora’s box… how about we just apply the law??
Colorado's election laws and the Constitution is clear. Donnie disqualified himself on Jan.6. But true to form…Donnie wants immunity from them.
Who is the ignorant anchor – the appeals courts almost always ask – "How did we get here?" Been an atty for decades and former clerk. He is ignorant.
Remember congress chanel that process losers Biden should be removed under 25th
Not happening people picks president not Colorado corrupt state
Biden losing
Going to lose Democrats
Even liberals saying corrupt colorado
Democrats take the loss you will lose
What will justice Harlan Crow decide?
So salty. 😂
Orange man DID NOT GET CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION, NOR HAS ANYONE BEEN CHARGED WITH INSURRECTION.
End Of Line
Stop lying
Trump 2024 🇺🇸💪 stop the madness
OK for all of you that are crying over things. What the ruling will state will be simple. They will rule that Jan 6th was not an insurrection. And that will be the end of it.
American Media?????
we see your bias CBS… we see operatives in J^ crowd.. we see nancy's daughter making a movie that day coincidentally.. we see the stand down order issued to the national guard and police. we see the pipe bomber who looks like an undercover agent .. we see ray epps leading the charge.. wanted list removal after release to press… we see the ability of the of the gov to not find the bomber… try not to be so slopy with operations.. its embarrassing.
Stop useless analysis. Let US SC make decision by law. Stop none sense.
TRUMP 2024!!!
Despite Trump claiming Democrats are attacking him,
it's also many well-known Republicans who are opposing Trump.
After a weeklong hearing in November, District Judge Sarah B. Wallace found that Trump indeed had “engaged in insurrection” by inciting the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol
Yes the supreme court does have jurisdiction over the state supreme court's it us the top court of the land over all 50 states the constutition gives it that power. There decision is finenal.
A bought and sold Supreme Court of Judicial Cowards who choose details over democracy. They sure didn’t care about the trouble it would cause when they took women’s right to choose away.
Hypocrites!