The Supreme Court docket heard the case, formally often known as Trump v. Anderson, which entails whether or not former President Donald …
source
The Supreme Court docket heard the case, formally often known as Trump v. Anderson, which entails whether or not former President Donald …
source
Copyright © 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.
Copyright © 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.
he has a boy, child.
13th ammendment.
Seems that non lawyers ? Trying give their legal opinions and their ? reading the court. Woke non attorneys state officials doing ? Illegal election interference? . Bozo the lawyer could win this easy . File a copy of the 1966 Miranda act. Mention so they hear . Your innocent until proven guilty. Your right to remain silent. Thank you. Woke band wants to jump over conviction, appeals, ect. Right to the top court. Some crazy trump deranged symptom thing..
lmfao🤣😂🤣
CO. You need to cheat to loose. 😂
Donald J Trump and Supreme Justices seem chummy.
Huh? When was "President Jackson impeached" (timestamp around 3:59)??? I thought Andrew Johnson, Bill Clinton, and Donald Trump were the only presidents to actually be impeached (Nixon resigned before impeachment proceedings began). Was Andrew Jackson impeached too??
Colorado followed their election laws and the Constitution, which disqualified Donnie. So this case is really about whether Donnie has immunity from Jan.6
Trump 9-0
Jothey have no proof only if the entire world is and was 🦯 blind
Sorry — but “What you could FEEL in the Judges Questions”was their FEAR of trump’s MAGA-CULT-PUPPETS and None of the judges who spoke want to be exposed to THAT.
These Judges seem to need more Spine but We’ll SEE. . .
SCOTUS spanked Colorado.
CBS commits act of Journalism first time in nearly 10 years. Wow, anything can happen. Lady reporter on the scene encapsulated better than the rest of fake news monopoly.
And they have no proof
Should a president be immune to prosecution: No
Should a state be allowed to remove somebody from the ballot: Also no
Vote blue in 2024!🌊🌊🌊
Roberts:!: sez we cant have a handful of states deciding whos president…what reality are you living in???! It alreafy is that way with the gerryandered BS and the electoral college.
..all we need to do is wait n see what roughly 5-6 states voters do. Rest of US might as well staying home.
This was over before it started. You could hear it in their voices.
Read Peter Navarro book on 1992 capital riot it's word for word as Jan 6 It wasn't planned 😂😂😂
Donald Trump is the Truth the Hope the Light and the Way for America and the World 0:36
No justice Kagan, your job is to rule if trump committed an insurrection and should be removed from the ballot. The case is not whether a state can remove a person from a ballot. In other words, is the decision of Colorado's court an accurate interpretation of the constitution? That is your job and you are avoiding it. The supreme court is afraid to make the right decision. I predicted the court would change the subject to avoid deciding the insurrection issue because insurrection was already established.