Monday, May 12, 2025
  • About us
  • Contact us
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub
  • Home
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos
Social icon element need JNews Essential plugin to be activated.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos
Social icon element need JNews Essential plugin to be activated.
No Result
View All Result
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub
No Result
View All Result

WATCH | Chris Hayes MELTS DOWN After SCOTUS Decides to Hear Trump Immunity Case: Rising

March 3, 2024
in Videos
Reading Time: 1 min read
A A
38



Briahna Pleasure Grey and Robby Soave weigh in on the Supreme Court docket’s choice to take up the case on whether or not Donald Trump can …

source

Tags: 2nd amendment2nd amendment rights2nd amendment supreme court cases2nd amendment uscaseChrisDecidesdemocratic partydemocratsDonald Trumpfreedom of speechfreedom of speech us amendmentfreedom of speech us bill of rightsgopgun legality usgun legislationguns amendmentguns amendment constitutionguns america digestguns america legitHayeshearimmunityMELTSpreppers guidepreppers newspresidential immunityProgressiveprogressive politicsrepublican partyrepublicansRisingscotussecond amendmenttrumpWATCH
Previous Post

Lawrence: Historians’ brief teaches Supreme Court 14th Amendment’s real history

Next Post

7.62 NATO vs .308 Winchester Ammo, What’s The Difference?

Next Post
7.62 NATO vs .308 Winchester Ammo, What’s The Difference?

7.62 NATO vs .308 Winchester Ammo, What’s The Difference?

100 Important Supreme Court Judgments Of 2023 – PART-3

100 Important Supreme Court Judgments Of 2023 - PART-3

Supreme Court social media cases, NATO expansion and more | Prime Time with John Dickerson

Supreme Court social media cases, NATO expansion and more | Prime Time with John Dickerson

Comments 38

  1. @brookss2141 says:
    1 year ago

    Bri is 100% right. Liberals are crying that its not going their way. Just as Trump with crying when he was charge conveniently right before the election.

    Reply
  2. @vforwombat9915 says:
    1 year ago

    "the supreme court has taken this case as quickly as they can…"

    a complete lie.

    they could have taken the case lat Nov when asked to.

    the could have fast tracked it.

    Reply
  3. @rfborden4854 says:
    1 year ago

    They are not activist judges. They are constitutionist, calling them conservative judges is a lie.

    Reply
  4. @Gandalf98 says:
    1 year ago

    Briahna says there is a Democrat side of this issue. I thought this was supposed to be a non-partisan issue. She is upset because the Democrat election campaign strategy to use the courts isn't working.

    Reply
  5. @bigred8438 says:
    1 year ago

    If I am not mistaken, it was Jack Smith who brought the query about the immunity aspect of presidency before the supreme court?

    Reply
  6. @shelbyroderfeld5943 says:
    1 year ago

    SCOTUS is out of order!!!

    Reply
  7. @viliamipasilitiaholelei4659 says:
    1 year ago

    America got a Maga kangaroo Supreme court
    America they got issues with ethics, that is no or low ethics basically corrupted. Heading to dictatorship

    Reply
  8. @jsim5572 says:
    1 year ago

    J6 tour wasn't an insurrection.

    Reply
  9. @allenlaib3800 says:
    1 year ago

    It's all election interference! That's what's happening here
    It's very clear to all of us that stand for what's right! Trump 2024 🇺🇲🇺🇸

    Reply
  10. @allenlaib3800 says:
    1 year ago

    We absolutely need President Trump back in office or we will not have a country. It's that simple.

    Reply
  11. @euryshampoo says:
    1 year ago

    He is my president 🇺🇸💞

    Reply
  12. @euryshampoo says:
    1 year ago

    Trump 2024 🇺🇸🙏

    Reply
  13. @euryshampoo says:
    1 year ago

    Good 🇺🇸

    Reply
  14. @dennissecor8092 says:
    1 year ago

    Trump 2024!!!😊

    Reply
  15. @attgogattgog8620 says:
    1 year ago

    Chris Hayes is in meltdown over Trump winning!

    Reply
  16. @Jojo_from_places says:
    1 year ago

    Conspiracy dictated

    Reply
  17. @danielrutschman4618 says:
    1 year ago

    Even a conviction won't turn many voters away from Trump because the alternative to Trump is Biden, which is even worse.

    Reply
  18. @Stassis says:
    1 year ago

    The DC court is partisan.

    Reply
  19. @basusudip says:
    1 year ago

    LOL.. remove a former President from ballot then call it to protect democracy!

    Reply
  20. @Juliet475 says:
    1 year ago

    Go TRUMP! ANOTHER insane decision to remove Trump from the Baallot …especially since Trump ha a hotel in Chicago.

    Reply
  21. @Juliet475 says:
    1 year ago

    Go TRUMP! ANOTHER insane decision to remove Trump from the Baallot …especially since Trump ha a hotel in Chicago.

    Reply
  22. @shawnastyer1566 says:
    1 year ago

    Trump supporters are NOT going ANYWHERE 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸PATRIOTS are standing with President Trump 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸TRUMP 2024🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

    Reply
  23. @besmartvoteblue2702 says:
    1 year ago

    When is the court going to relieve themselves of Thomas? He's utterly corrupt.

    Reply
  24. @user-id8oh1yj9h says:
    1 year ago

    She is wrong… she needs to read the law.

    Reply
  25. @milescoleman910 says:
    1 year ago

    It’s almost like it’s all been put in on an exact timeline. I mean why would anyone care if it’s put back a month or a year. Unless there’s some other reason they want these trials to happen sooner. But then that would mean they are just purely political trials?

    Reply
  26. @chunkyMunky329 says:
    1 year ago

    How come even the young turks is able to admit that this can't be political since even the democrat judges are interested in taking on this case??? I'm unsubscribing to this channel. This is embarrasing that TYT is doing better reporting than you!

    Reply
  27. @philliphall2162 says:
    1 year ago

    * Smart People Know : Never to Believe a Word that comes out a DemocRATS Mouth , Full Stop !

    Reply
  28. @edwarcandy4648 says:
    1 year ago

    Trump went to trial for this already,Wow that was fast

    Reply
  29. @chrisschade6854 says:
    1 year ago

    Attempting TO END DEMOCRACY 😂😂🤣🤣

    Reply
  30. @oakleystactics579 says:
    1 year ago

    States have threatened to remove Biden from the ballot what is good for the goose is good for the gander. The supreme court is supposed to look at the laws of the USA to stop political witch hunts by states to determine who can run for president.

    Reply
  31. @davemacdonald5261 says:
    1 year ago

    Bri, you you just said the quiet part out loud…democrat media!

    Reply
  32. @davemacdonald5261 says:
    1 year ago

    Bri, you mean far left DC Judges!
    So in your mind(?), it's okay for far left judges to make their decision, but not right wing judges!
    Robbie, all political charges!

    Reply
  33. @dougohatt says:
    1 year ago

    The characterization in your headline is completely inaccurate and misleading. No one who has ever read the US Constitution would ever entertain Trump’s motion and the SCOTUS decision to make the decision how and when they did indicates bad faith on the Republican majority’s part.

    Reply
  34. @rudyhorang6553 says:
    1 year ago

    Your "reports "is totally BS without any merit

    Reply
  35. @tonydoesntcare says:
    1 year ago

    All presidents have immunity for official acts

    Reply
  36. @karengvozdenovic5145 says:
    1 year ago

    Oh no…poor Democrats…they cant control everything with their unbelievable corruption…throeing thrir toys out of the pram will change nothing 😂😂😂 Democrats actually believe they can destroy democracy by deciding who is on the ballot and who people can vote for. Trump was NEVER convicted of Insurrection…which it wasn't. The democratscwanted to pavk the court and ate now up in srms because they csnnot cintrol the law thst they say no-one…except them…is above. States do not have the legal right to decide Trump committed Insurrection…that comes only from the Senate.If Democrats wanted speadier resolution of cases….why did they wait this long to bring forward their fake charges….we all know why…election interferance ….Nothing is sticking to Trump because the charges are fake …Trump broke no laws….

    Reply
  37. @zachmorgan6982 says:
    1 year ago

    If they grant him IMMUNITY EVEN REPUBLICANS WILL HAVE HAVE HAVE HAVVVVVEEEE TO STAND AGAINST IT. THE WHOLE POINT OF THE CONSTITUTION IS THAT NOBODY…I MEAN ABSOLUTELY NOBODDDYYYYY IS ABOVE THE LAW.

    Gov officials above the law are dictators or members of corrupt parties like the ccp

    Reply
  38. @jackwhite6030 says:
    1 year ago

    That owl guy from MSNBC is totally lying. Also Trump had total immunity period full stop.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to @jsim5572 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CATEGORIES

  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos
No Result
View All Result

LATEST UPDATES

  • LIVE: President Biden’s State of the Union address full coverage
  • Exploring The Pros And Cons Of Using Once Fired Brass And New Brass For Reloading
  • SAF BRIEF SUPPORTS SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION IN WAITING PERIOD CHALLENGE
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos

Copyright © 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.