Modi authorities on Monday notified CAA guidelines, earlier than Lok Sabha polls announcement. In episode 1074 of #CutTheClutter, …
source
Modi authorities on Monday notified CAA guidelines, earlier than Lok Sabha polls announcement. In episode 1074 of #CutTheClutter, …
source
The equal treatment before law is for all citizens. Here people have not even become citizens
First…….
The country was divided in name of Muslims,only they wanted a separate nation.
So why care of their aspect in indiian context ?
Second…..
For SG Indian democracy is only Muslim concerned. His all arguments are Muslim centric.
Third….
On one hand he justifies Assam logic and on other hand denies the same whole of nation.
Talking of second largest majority and justifies it as minority.
Didn't even heed to really talk of minorities.
Just pathetic.
In Assam the refugees that came in Bharat & did not go back were entirely Muslims & got citizenship & changed the demography of the state & Congress ripped its benefits
Very good decision by government ❤
Illegal migration is a major challenge India is facing. If not NRC what's the solution?
Lets have a constructive discussion, based on sound reasonable arguments. We owe our allegiance to India not any political party.
They are already living in the country since Dec 2014 or before and have been using resources since then. They dont need new funds. But kejriwal is manipulative by saying new people are being migrated. CAA is only for refugees who came before Dec 2014. Kejriwal and such journalists are most disgusting politician who misguides people. Did you ever talk the same about Rohingyas who are around 2 crores living illegally in country and doing crimes? They participated in delhi riots in 2020. Kejriwal and such journalists know it all but doing vote bank politics and thus are most dangerous for this country.
They are already living in the country since Dec 2014 or before and have been using resources since then. They dont need new funds. But kejriwal is manipulative by saying new people are being migrated. CAA is only for refugees who came before Dec 2014. Kejriwal is most disgusting politician who misguides people. Did you eve talk the same about Rohingyas who are around 2 crores living illegally in country and doing crimes? They participated in delhi riots in 2020. Kejriwal knows it all but doing vote bank politics. He is most dangerous for this country.
Comfused thoughts of a senile person
Wahoo! U r sooo good.
In twisting the fact and truth and white lining, and confusion the people who have no knowledge or have little.No wonder many believe u .
Enemy's properties are kept intact in India not given to Hindu refugees
NRC/CAA will kill India.
This not cut the clutter, this is more of twisting facts to confuse people who have not read the CAA amendment. Central givt also want this confusion prevail due to some.reason.
We should not give any justification to those against CAA
They are just Hindu haters, they don't have any humanity angle, they never asked for citizenship of Hindus denied citizenship to kashmiri Hindus under 52A
Rather they should demand that Pakistan Bangladesh and afganistan should enact a CAA for Indian Muslims so that the Muslims of india should migrate to these countries
CAA has nothing to do or impact Indians. It's only for non Indians.
Critics & media are criticising and trying to confusd common men. Print is making CAA confusing & complex and close to half lies.
CAA IS THE LAW MADE BY SUPREME AUTHRITY OF BHARAT THAT IS LOKSABHA !
ANYBODY AGAINST THE LAW COULD GO TO SUPREME COUR
ANYBODY VOILANTLY AGAINST THE LAW MUST BE DEALT STRICTLY!
MAKE THE LAW AN EXTENSION TO NEHARU-LIAQUT PACT!
People only leave their country and enter other illegally when there is a threat to their life in their own country.
1. The fundamental flaw in this law is the assumption that this threat could only have come due to religious affiliation of a person. There can be political reasons or other reasons as well.
2. The second flaw is assuming that even among the religions, only a subset have faced life threats and others had not.
So what is the purpose of this law? If we agree that this government is very noble and wants to help migrant people get citizenship and full rights in this country, then this law looks pretty incomplete as it leaves out major chunk of migrants.
And if the purpose is to benefit only a small part of migrants based on religion, how can we as a secular nation justify this? PLAIN & SIMPLE.
🇮🇳 Jai Bharat, As A Hindusthani ,We are Proud, At least Now Onwards we can Hope that We Can Get Rid of Rohingyas (They are Bangladeshi Muslims)
I'm from Assam and I don't want CAA in Assam. CAA can be implemented in Gujarat, UP, Bihar, WB and in Hell but never will be accepted in Assam.
Why are those consentration camps in Assan built for? 16:40
Citizenship act :- .1) It is wholly matter of Union to make law.2) Vide article 256 all states are constitutionally bound to follow laws made by Parliament .Only remedy is if SC declares a Central act as Unconstitutional. 3) Art 14 > It has two parts a) Equality before law b) Equal protection of law . For whom it is applicable ? Constitution says ," State shall not deny any person [repeat , any person ] Yes, All are equal before any law . And law is applicable to all. BUT , ALL LAWS ARE NOT IN EQUAL type of LAW . ALL LAWS ARE CATEGORISED . So, article 14 never said , all laws are equally applicable to all . For an Indian Violation of foreigner's act will certainly not be applicable . Non Indian can not claim Government Job , Non Indian can not compete in election . Non Indians are not covered by Indian Tax laws etc etc. So before applicability of any law to any person , it is to be seen first , under which law the person is covered . Then question of discrimination will arise.
Citizenship act :- 1) It is in part II of Constitution of India ; Not a FR chapter of Constitution of India.
2) For Citizenship act , it is the parliament who enjoys unfettered right , not any state Legislature vide art,11. 3) Since independence Nehruji , Patelji, Gandhiji even CPI[M] as a party advocated such act . Can it be denied ?
Preamble of our Constitution :- WE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA ……………certainly a NON CITIZEN can not be called as "WE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA"
lastly , CAN A MATTER UNDER PART II BE TESTED BY MATTERS UNDER PART III. ART.11 IS A MATTER OF PART II AND ART 14 IS A MATTER OF PART III.
Sir Indian constitution is for giving protection to citizens of India. So Article 14 applies to citizens of India only. CAA is for non citizens of India who intend to take up Indian citizenship. So clearly Article 14 of Indian constitution does not apply. This is common sense and Govt is not fool to do such a silly mistake. Let the opposition does whatever they want. Now the real question is whether citizenship should be given to enemies just based on religion. That may be matter of may security concern. And secondly how we are verifying their actual religion. I believe India shouldn’t give citizenship just like that without any thorough scrutiny. And we are already 1.4 billion and this act may increase illegal migration to India in a hope that they may get citizenship in future. So this is dangerous for national security. Hence I believe CAA is not required.
Govt at present is not going to survey any migrants. Only those Migrants who want to get Citizen ship of india will be asked to register with the govt.
So muslim who don't want to be exposed need not go for registration. Why confuse muslims iver it. Make it clear. Stop misleading muslims.
CAA great act. Waiting for NRC, which will facilitate identifying 5-10crore illegal immigrants from India, and send them back to their respective countries. We can also send them to USA and Europe in ships, if they have problem with it.
USA UN never asked Pakistan Afghanistan Bangladesh for atrocities on Hindus. Will US or Europe ready to take them.
Govt is fulfilling Nehru Liquat pact. It could had been done in 1947.
Badhiya baat hai
Once Bharat was broken on the basis of Religion!! A country could be broken by religion then why not just a law can't be implemented!! 😂😂.. Hypocrisy at high 😂😂
Full support CAA.. ❤❤
NRC is also required in India. So many illegal Bangladeshi muslims and Rohingya muslims are living in India. All these illegal muslims should be sent to there respective nations. We Indians already gave Muslims Pakistan and Bangladesh and they still want to live illegally in India. How it is possible? Congress and all other opposition parties are against Hindus. Hindus should open there eyes now.. These muslims have so many countries but we HINDUS don't have any other country to go. More than 60 Islamic countries are there for Muslims. Let them go there.
Agenda journalist
This guy is trying to confuse the issue. Unnecessary bringing unrelated issues.
CAA is about giving citizenship to people who seek refuge in India due to religious discrimination in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh.
Non-Muslims in Pak, Afghanistan and Bangladesh are discriminated against constitutionally in those countries as they Islamic countries.
Why interested muslims about caa, because of refuse. Why muslims come to bharath for citizen ship. Musilms not safe their mother land. Think right way media.
Citizenship not decided pepole.
please don't oppose the bill, my family came to india in 1947, and many us like still coming to India because of religious inharmony, people from Sindh and Punjab has done what wrong, why they can't be citizen of india?, it should be there right to be a citizen of indian.
more power to dreeenda muudi for taking these actions
.i just wish he had taken these decisions 2 years back.
What about minorities in Myanmar, Srilanka, Nepal? They are our neighbors too
I wish Pakistan and Bangladesh enact similar rule for 'persecuted' Muslims in India and then see how many of them are willing to relocate from India to these countries.
Amit shah and Modi have no jobs only to disturb piece.
CAA Fiasco?
.
A section of Indians based on their religion, partitioned an ancient land for a land exclusively for themselves. 96% of the Believers who could vote, voted for this partition in the 1946 elections.
.
Their demand was the whole of Bengal including Calcutta (the Muslim League was established in Dhaka in 1906, by the Urdu-speaking Turki Zamindars there) – the western half of Punjab, the whole of Sindh and NWPF.
.
The idea of Pakistan – exclusive land for Indian Muslims.
.
Again 96% voted for this partition. Landless people were not allowed to vote under the British Administration.
.
At that time, at least 28% of the population of East Pakistan (today fancifully known as Bangladesh) were non-believers. Technically Kafirs and Infidels according to their worldview and will go to hell after death 😉
.
Today it is hovering around 8% in Bangladesh and decreasing every year – kapurush kafirs either ran away or were exterminated.
.
In West Pakistan, the population of kafirs, infidels and polytheists was around 15% just before partition and now less than 2%.
.
Ideally, Chacha Nehru and Mohandas led INC should have asked for a proper population exchange – allow kafirs to come to partitioned India, and Allah's people to move over to East and West Pakistan.
Made a decision. Honour it.
But population exchange did not happen, but kafir population started vanishing in any case from East and West Pakistan.
.
Kafirs are Kapurush? Of course.
.
Kafirs ran away from their ancestral land without any resistance. Partition was nothing but organized loot if you think about it.
.
Whereas Allah's people flourished in partitioned India
.
From 8% after partition, it is close to 15% today and increasing.
.
CAA should be amended to remove the 2014 cutoff and 5-year residency requirements. But Modi and Amit Shah were cunning as well. Waiting to milk the issue another day.
.
People can come anytime, and after only 1 year of residency, kafirs and infidels from Pakistan and Bangladesh can demand citizenship in their Mother Land.
.
This is a moral responsibility of other kafirs and Infidels in India.
.
This helps the idea of Pakistan in any case.
.
Clean up Bangladesh and Pakistan of lowly kafirs and Infidels.
.
As far as protests in India by fellow kafirs are concerned – dementia, delusion and hypocrisy may be the reason.
.
Allah's punishment is 1000 years of hellfire for hypocrites, they should know.
.
For Muslim groups in India protesting? Cunning at best.
I have a profound sense of empathy towards the youth of India, recognizing the multifaceted challenges they encounter in navigating societal narratives shaped by historical burdens. It is palpable that concerted efforts are underway to mould their perspectives, often laden with biases inherited from the past. This complex amalgamation of influences underscores a journey that, in my estimation, may span several hundred years before India realizes its fullest potential. This perspective isn't merely speculative; rather, it's grounded in a nuanced understanding of the intricate dynamics at play within Indian society.
The only rational person Dr. Ambedkar suggested total population transfer. CAA is 75yr late it should have been implemented just after partition done on religious basis. It could have been saved millions of innocent lives.
I really dont understand what is wrong in kicking out infiltrators.Why shd we allow infiltrators in our country?That faith who treat minorities badly shd be treated badly.What is morally correct?To treat ppl of that faith, which has historically always treated you badly, in a good way?What nonsense!
Country was divided on religion, hindu land given muslim refugee in pak bangladesh, so all muslim land should have provided to refugee hindus, but stipid coward brainless secular given to waqf to create refugee crise and NE insurgency.
What nonsense 🎉🎉🎉
It is the first step of hindu rastra
In 1947 country was not divided for secularism. Brainless and heartless librandu never feel pain of millions of non-Muslims persecuted by jihadis. It was divided over millions of dead bodies for muslims to create separate islamic state where wiped out millions non-Muslims. CAA is helping only few thousand of persecuted by Jihadis..
24% Muslims got 24% most fertile land in 1947 where they declared islamic states and wiped out minorities. 24% to 5%.by jihad. Still with khangress blessings they stay back in India, flourish to became second largest in world. Now they want play victim card to bring all muslims from islamic state.
A perfect example of eating cake and having it too.
While poor hindus lost everything got wiped out from their ancentral land without any noise and sympathy on that side and faced jihadi terrorism and Gazwa e hind 2047in India
Due to stupid anti hindu secularism of Khangress and Iibrandus.
This guy is spinning facts and misleading audience. Please stop hating Hindus & manufacture lies to please your lobby.