Fulton County Superior Court docket Decide Scott McAfee heard pretrial motions within the Georgia election interference case in opposition to former …
source
Fulton County Superior Court docket Decide Scott McAfee heard pretrial motions within the Georgia election interference case in opposition to former …
source
It's very strange. . . you watch the same video from opposing news companies and see two very different views of peoples minds. The only difference is the platform the news is being delivered on. You should think about the information you are taking in and believing. The comments I see on this thread are very interesting in a communistic manner. Such as lock him up until the trial. Many of the cries on this post are just anti-American in general. People on this thread crying to thier version of god to have this man condemned. . . I don't see anyone on this thread calling for fairness and equality under law and freedom or true justice. I see Americas calling for and begging for very anti-American values. Again. . . the only difference is the platform the news is delivered on. Not the news itself. I would really pay attention to what I listened to if I was any of you. Whether Trump be guilty, or innocent. You all are being very mislead from American values and towards a very communistic path of leadership that can strip your rights with no question asked. The purpose of the Government is to restrict the governments powers over the people and not total control of the people. Please wake up. It's not to late to fix this society and this great country – but you really need to educate yourselves and stop believing agenda that is being seared in your minds.
The lying left and Corrupt Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger hid the fact that signature verifications were not performed in Fulton County (where Atlanta is located) on 147,000 ballots in the 2020 Election, yet they certified a Joe Biden “win” by 12,000 votes.🤡
FULTON county committed voter fraud.- its been proven even though judges blocked release of evidence for 3 yrs. Because the ballots were destroyed.
Everyone knows that they cheated in the last presidental election! Just because those who are in power and those in the media refuse to investigate the challenges of a fair election ,does not mean the election was fair;. There was a conspiracy to defraud the American people and it went straight to the top of the Democratic national party, the United States postal service ,the FBI ,GOOGLE, FACEBOOK , YOUtube ,RHINO'S OF THE Republican Party ….ALL will be exposed in their roll to cheat in the election. The ship is sinking and the rats are abandoning ship, the truth will come forth!
These guys swore for months and months that they had evidence of a stolen election. This is their moment to show the evidence and here we are; they could present it now on live TV ; Now all they can do is argue that his lies are free speech?? Anyone still supporting him after this have got to understand that all that election crap is COPE and nothing else. You guys are being duped and apparently you like it. Fake patriots everywhere
Our Freedom is being stomped on! We are allowed to have Free Speech! Inferences in Liberal Courts show Bias Across the Land!! Media attacks on Trump day and night! We are understandably concerned for Mr. Trumps rights are violated !!!
Trump needs Immunity now ! ❤
Trump is scared to face DA Willis in court🤣
Mr. Sadow didn’t like the fact that there were TWO lawyers from the state that got up and went to the podium to speak🤣 Fast forward to 35:33🤣
cant wait trump 2024
No one will
This Is all dumb chair men that don't improve
😮
I bet the lawyer married the thugs lol
Oh my god is the judge gonna marry Rico!!
Oh my god this is messed up they hurt the poor and mix the country
my bad he does use a lot of 'um's but still a very smooth delivery.
i was just viewing past court room action in this case and was paying particular attention to mr.wade and he comes across as pretty self-confident and assured of himself, impeccably dressed and exudes confidence in his command of presented case law – don't take my word for it, sartorial splendor not included. them suits look awfully expensive, with the monogrammed shirts – the complete lawyerly package. no wonder they wanted him off the case – not a lot of 'Um's in his speech. johnny cochran revisited
Please do the right thing! God is with you! I trust your judgment !
Trump is insane.🩵💙💙🩵
Again, with the same judge, he messed up the first time. Unbelievable.
I'm honestly curious about the whole allegations of criminal fraud and the subsequent actions that followed such as "filing false documents" etc….
At the time of the 2020 election and months up to inauguration, there were filings across the country by individual citizens who witnessed irregularities. There were audits of the ballot counts in multiple states in progress, lawsuits being filed in multiple states by people and groups that were not associated with the Trump admin. with some cases pending review by the court etc…..
So there was no answer to whether claims of election voting fraud was true or false or even false or true with some exceptions. AFAIK, there were numerous court cases along with the full scale AZ audit for maricopa county. Many cases actually proved fraud others didnt, and the AZ audit only confirmed that the total ballot count was correct but highlighted a number of areas that were of serious concern but could not be verified or confirmed due to various barriers, and which by all estimates had the potential of overturning the ballot count result.
So ultimately it was factually proven no widespread fraud was uncovered, that would change the election results. That finding was determined long after the fact of the alledged criminality. So my question is how exactly is it criminal conspiracy, fraud, false statements when at the time it could have been proven true just as much as it could have been false. I would understand if there was actual substantive proof that claims of election fraud was in fact false before and at the time of all the allegations.
But the allegations are based on what the state beleives to be false after considering the findings from various sources, and that didnt occur until long after the alledged acts. Is this properly founded in terms of legality for indictments against someone? Its an odd set of circumstance IMHO. For example, someone committing identification fraud by using a fake ID impersonating someone else, forging a signature etc…. Is that essentially the same as someone beieving they weigh 150lbs(last time they checked) and attesting to that at the DMV. Later to find out they weigh 160lbs. According to the states reasoning, in of itself the latter is and can be determined as a false and fraudulent statement/ falsified govt form right? Even though there was no evidence to support either way, simply because it can be "proven" otherwise after the fact is enough to prosecute. A hypothetical situation I would use to point out a difference if any would be the following. I get pulled over and cited for speeding 40 in a 30mph zone were there was no sign posted for 5miles up to that point and non for 5 miles past. The govt had no evidence that a speed zone for 30mph was designated there. Later to find some document dating back decades that mentioned a plan for it. Technically I end up breaking the law as an issue of fact right and can and will be fined in violation for it right? I cant agree that should be legal nor be misinterpreted to be justifiable.
Laptop anyone? 🙄
ZERO Freedom of Speech!!!
So sick of this corrupt judges!!!
I WONDER HOW MUCH SORROS PAY THE JUDGE TO THROW TRUMP UNDER THE BUS.
CROOKED JUDGE HE IS GOING TO RE WRITE THE LAW TO FIT HIS AGENDA
The biggest crock of bull I ever heard! The second guy is even worse! They don’t even believe what they’re saying!
This is what $56 million in superpac money buys these days?
Just from the first minutes of Trump's bullshitters ("lawyers"): Trump's political "speech" is protected? What? So if Trump campaigns on defaming someone or demanding to have someone killed, this is supposed to be protected. The bullshitter is arguing, that as more intense the criminal statement is, the more it is political speech. LOL … Basically, Hitler's call for genocide was just intensive political speech and should be protected.
Judge needs to dismiss this case. We don't live in a banana Republic.
This judge is a joke
Trump said in the phone call he believed there were tens of thousands of fraudulent votes cast in Georgia and asked the Sec. of State to find 11,000 from those fraudulent votes. WE ALL SAW THE LATE NIGHT SECURITY CAM VIDEO OF DEMOCRATIC ELECTION OFFICIALS IN ATLANTA PULLING BOXES OF PAPER BOXES OUT FROM UNDER BLACK DRAPED TABLES AFTER EVERYONE ELSE WAS SENT HOME ON THE RUSE OF A WATER MAIN BREAK! IT'S NAIVE TO THINK CHEATING DIDN'T GO ON!
Mr. Trumps lawyers believe if you cant dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with B.S.
YOU ARE LOOKING AT A CROOK JUDGE.SHAME ON HIM.