[ad_1]
BELLEVUE, WA – Attorneys representing the Second Modification Basis and its companions in a federal problem of the Illinois ban on trendy semi-auto firearms and “large-capacity magazines” have filed a petition with the U.S. Supreme Court docket, searching for certiorari within the case of Harrel v. Raoul.
SAF is joined by the Illinois State Rifle Affiliation, Firearms Coverage Coalition, Inc., C4 Gun Retailer, LLC, Marengo Weapons, Inc., and a non-public citizen, Dane Harrel, for whom the case is called. The federal criticism was initially filed in January 2023. They’re represented by attorneys David Thompson, Peter Patterson, and Will Bergstrom of Cooper & Kirk, PLLC and David Sigale in Wheaton, Unwell.
“Clearly,” stated SAF founder and Govt Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb, “the Illinois gun and journal bans are unconstitutional underneath ideas set down within the 2008 Heller ruling and the 2022 Bruen resolution. In each of these opinions, the excessive court docket stated the Second Modification protects firearms in widespread use. It’s indeniable that trendy semiautomatic rifles and magazines holding greater than ten cartridges are in widespread use by tens of hundreds of thousands of U.S. residents, so such a ban is, within the court docket’s personal phrases, ‘off the desk.’”
“The questions listed here are easy and simple,” defined SAF Govt Director Adam Kraut. “Does the U.S. Structure enable the federal government to ban law-abiding, accountable, peaceful residents from defending themselves, their households and houses with semiautomatic firearms which are in widespread use? Does the identical Structure enable the federal government to ban those self same residents from utilizing commonly-owned magazines for such protecting functions? Pending comparable actions in different jurisdictions make it paramount that the Supreme Court docket settle for this case for overview, because the decrease courts proceed to disregard the Court docket’s edict.”
Gottlieb and Kraut say this case exemplifies SAF’s dedication to successful firearms freedom one lawsuit at a time, and can enable the Court docket to additional outline the parameters of the Second Modification.
[ad_2]
Source link
