Friday, May 16, 2025
  • About us
  • Contact us
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub
  • Home
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos
Social icon element need JNews Essential plugin to be activated.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos
Social icon element need JNews Essential plugin to be activated.
No Result
View All Result
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub
No Result
View All Result

SHORT TAKE: U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument on Former President Trump’s Colorado Ballot Eligibility

February 23, 2024
in Videos
Reading Time: 1 min read
A A
30



SHORT TAKE: Take a look at this compilation of main moments from immediately’s U.S. Supreme Court docket Oral Argument: Trump v. Anderson …

source

Tags: 2nd amendment2nd amendment rights2nd amendment supreme court cases2nd amendment usArgumentballotcoloradoCOURTEligibilityfreedom of speechfreedom of speech us amendmentfreedom of speech us bill of rightsgun legality usgun legislationguns amendmentguns amendment constitutionguns america digestguns america legitOralpreppers guidepreppers newspresidentsecond amendmentshortSupremeTrumpsU.S
Previous Post

15” AR10 Handguard

Next Post

Hungarian AKs (Part 3): AMD 65

Next Post
Hungarian AKs (Part 3): AMD 65

Hungarian AKs (Part 3): AMD 65

Supreme Court HAS BIG DECISION in Trump CRIMINAL Case

Supreme Court HAS BIG DECISION in Trump CRIMINAL Case

LIVE: Supreme Court HEARING on Trump DISQUALIFICATION

LIVE: Supreme Court HEARING on Trump DISQUALIFICATION

Comments 30

  1. @markjn5790 says:
    1 year ago

    The notion that what happened on Jan 6 is an "insurrection" is cruel comedy and purely designed to harm Trump.

    Reply
  2. @steverevoir8369 says:
    1 year ago

    All these supreme Court justices from Colorado should be barred

    Reply
  3. @deanlandry2045 says:
    1 year ago

    Bull they have no idea what they are doing . there was no insurrections G od not sleeping .

    Reply
  4. @Josh-vy2zq says:
    1 year ago

    If the rules if laws in the land are current the suprime court will always do the right thing. No lied is worth the history of this land .

    Reply
  5. @CrazyAboutVinylRecords says:
    1 year ago

    Apparently the U.S. Supreme Court is about to declare the 14th Amendment, Section 3, to be unconstitutional. Lol.

    Reply
  6. @yashamaga1319 says:
    1 year ago

    Even the affirmative action judge is ruling against this sham 😂

    Reply
  7. @J.Burrough says:
    1 year ago

    Court has been corrupted. They’ve sold us out & they’ve a sold their on wives, husbands, children, grandchildren and parents out as well. Complete shame they choose global corruption to truth safety and their swearing in of their oath. The lies upon lies upon lies heard in these segments are sickening and I pray they all get what they deserve.

    Reply
  8. @mathanmathai says:
    1 year ago

    Trump is a man with a child's brain and this is how he will act all the time from young to old.
    How is he going to run America with his childish nature.
    That's why he did the the Jan 6 coup and at that time he was a sitting President. A spoilt child brought up in other ways so pampered and spoilt to the core. Vote Blus

    Reply
  9. @delleenamyers5266 says:
    1 year ago

    I also think the people who live in Colorado have the rite to say whether they want trump on there ballot. I live in Colorado and I DO NOT WANT TRUMP included. I personally don’t like trump. I WILL NOT VOTE FOR TRUMP HE IS NOTHING MORE THAN A CRIMINAL AND THINKS BECAUSE HE WAS OUR PRESIDENT ( big mistake) THAT HE SHOULDN’T BE CHARGED WITH ANY CRIMES. That’s BS.

    Reply
  10. @Mollyevans001 says:
    1 year ago

    Interpetation of Constituted protection against Elected officials,that in Trust ,break their Oath! While in
    office therefore a add n officer of the u.S.A.

    Reply
  11. @richardhoner7842 says:
    1 year ago

    "Not an Officer" is silly. Anyone that took an Oath to the Constitution is the key point.

    Reply
  12. @LordChompipe says:
    1 year ago

    Then, a President could technically lead an insurrection and never have to answer to the Constitution?

    Reply
  13. @kenlangille4474 says:
    1 year ago

    Justice will prevail. You won’t be able to choose, Americans will choose who is president. Another tax funded witch hunt

    Reply
  14. @CH-gc8hf says:
    1 year ago

    So, in other words this dingy liberal lawyer is saying all removal cases against a democratic candidate would be frivolous but not for a Republican one. What a hypocrite!!

    Reply
  15. @billyrajoo8076 says:
    1 year ago

    He is not former president Trump .Everybody now must know he is CITIZEN. TUMP . The world must know this too .He is not above the Law .Treat him just like any ordinary citizen 💙💙💙

    Reply
  16. @Ilyaswashere says:
    1 year ago

    I don’t like Trump, however this will create precedent to remove any candidate on loose terms regarding political rhetoric, and I think we can all assume every state will have a bias and remove their opponent on the ballot. It’s pretty concerning

    Reply
  17. @randyc9700 says:
    1 year ago

    Control, attention blah, blah, blah nothing.

    Reply
  18. @archielea1200 says:
    1 year ago

    Thus Says the LORD God of Hosts in Jesus Christ Name amen and amen Prove it Says the living God in Jesus Christ Name amen and amen Says IAM that Iam Amen and amen

    Reply
  19. @archielea1200 says:
    1 year ago

    God forbid!

    Reply
  20. @BillonBass says:
    1 year ago

    That did not go well for Colorado. Something this lopsided shows the state judges are either incompetent, corrupt or and likely both.

    Reply
  21. @jefferytodd7017 says:
    1 year ago

    Highly political right wing SCOTUS.

    Reply
  22. @AnonymousAnonym-ty6dw says:
    1 year ago

    You have a number of brilliant constitutional scholars serving on the Supreme Court, both Conservative and Liberal. In their wisdom they are seeing (from different lenses) how this is not a matter that should be left to the states. There are also two constitutional scholars arguing before them, but it is quite clear that Marshall is the most matured, seasoned and knowledgeable scholar of the two. You can tell with how he so biasedly asserts that Trump committed insurrection when Trump has never been found guilty of! Nor does the attorney considers that an “insurrection” that is “unarmed” is nothing more than a riot. I mean, the crowds on January 6th were UNARMED! How in the world did they hope to succeed going up against police and agents who have the fire power to kill them all?? Moreover, Trumps words were “We are NOT people of violence but people of the law.” Those do not sound like the words of an insurrectionist!

    Reply
  23. @LoveLove-gw2td says:
    1 year ago

    If Trump wasn't present at the capital on Jan 6, then he didn't participate in itJ

    Reply
  24. @DebraAM56 says:
    1 year ago

    My question…Jan 6 President Trump asked the ppl he was speaking to to be peaceful and patriotic. The ppl that caused the disruption started going in prior to the ppl that President Trump was talking to before they even got there AND it has already came out that there were MANY ppl dressed as Trump supporters that were not AND FBI HAD MANY UNDER COVER FACILITATING MUCH OF WHAT WAS GOING ON. WHY CANT THAT BE BROUGHT Out?? Pretty sad. God bless the USA 🇺🇸

    Reply
  25. @missmarya747 says:
    1 year ago

    These corrupt justices are for crimes and criminals. States rights in roe v wade but not 14/3. They have already ruled before the hearing, They will take the off ramp and disenfranchise We The Free Sound Mind People of the USA 🇺🇸 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸. We all seen the Violent ASSULT on the capitol.

    Reply
  26. @Mollikar says:
    1 year ago

    Jason Murray, no your honor you will make the decision for us on a case by case basis whenever we feel like doing this again, is where I think he lost this case. There will be a no fking way vote on that.

    Reply
  27. @gramuddah says:
    1 year ago

    No the evidence isn’t released yet we have 200 – 300 high up officials who set it all up and were dressed as TRUMPERS YOU LIARS. You’re all going to be charged so- sit tight make popcorn !! 😂

    Reply
  28. @markkirkland1433 says:
    1 year ago

    It’s a FEDERAL election.
    Trump MEETS all the requirements of out Constitution to be eligible to run for President.
    Subjective speculation attempting to use ambiguous interpretation of the 14th amendment isn’t a qualification criteria.

    Reply
  29. @SusanBLochocki says:
    1 year ago

    Because that's how it works one state one person has that power

    Reply
  30. @SusanBLochocki says:
    1 year ago

    This is a farce

    Reply

Leave a Reply to @Josh-vy2zq Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CATEGORIES

  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos
No Result
View All Result

LATEST UPDATES

  • LIVE: President Biden’s State of the Union address full coverage
  • Exploring The Pros And Cons Of Using Once Fired Brass And New Brass For Reloading
  • SAF BRIEF SUPPORTS SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION IN WAITING PERIOD CHALLENGE
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos

Copyright © 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.