Friday, July 4, 2025
  • About us
  • Contact us
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub
  • Home
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos
Social icon element need JNews Essential plugin to be activated.
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos
Social icon element need JNews Essential plugin to be activated.
No Result
View All Result
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub
No Result
View All Result

Duncan v. Bonta California Mag Ban

March 27, 2024
in Videos
Reading Time: 1 min read
A A
33



Now we have been ready practically half a yr for any new information within the case of Duncan v. Bonta. This case challenges California’s ban …

source

Tags: 20242nd amendment2nd amendment rights2nd amendment supreme court cases2nd amendment usappealargumentsBanBontaCaliforniaCommentaryDecisionduncanduncan v bontafreedom of speechfreedom of speech us amendmentfreedom of speech us bill of rightsgun legality usgun legislationguns amendmentguns amendment constitutionguns america digestguns america legitHearingherdInjunctionJUDGMENTlcmMAGmag banMarchnewop edopinionoral argumentsorderpreppers guidepreppers newsruledrulingsecond amendmentTodayupdateupdates
Previous Post

WEX Wakeup: Special counsel report on Biden classified documents is complete

Next Post

Best Survival Seed Kit for Your Prepper Garden

Next Post
Best Survival Seed Kit for Your Prepper Garden

Best Survival Seed Kit for Your Prepper Garden

🚨 Trump’s Legal Hopes BUSTED by Michael Cohen and TOP State Prosecutor | Mea Culpa

🚨 Trump's Legal Hopes BUSTED by Michael Cohen and TOP State Prosecutor | Mea Culpa

Empowering Women With Homestead Security

Empowering Women With Homestead Security

Comments 33

  1. @marccampbell6750 says:
    1 year ago

    Wait a minute!!! Precursor part? WTF! Communism at its best!!!

    Reply
  2. @yunoticklemyballs says:
    1 year ago

    These judges get away with defying the Supreme Court. We allow state courts to ping pong cases back and forth as a way to infringe on our rights. We need to clean up our court systems so this does not happen.

    Reply
  3. @donwolfstein says:
    1 year ago

    I can save you the trouble. The will remaind banned, just like the assualt weapons ban. Just blatant disregard for the Constitution and the freedoms of the people

    Reply
  4. @Calaveras32Spcl says:
    1 year ago

    To many judges who believe they are the law, and not stewards of the law.

    Reply
  5. @rafaela9781 says:
    1 year ago

    What a bunch of idiots….. If the magazine is not an arm but an accessory, then receivers, triggers, stocks and frames are accessories too.

    Reply
  6. @kurtphillips7038 says:
    1 year ago

    Bet you 100.00 dollars Cali wins!

    Reply
  7. @michaelm6845 says:
    1 year ago

    When should we expect the ruling?

    Reply
  8. @Kn0wnKidd says:
    1 year ago

    Everyone in that courtroom look like they never held, fired, or looked at a gun before. They should get people who could explain weapons and how they’re used right and etc.

    Reply
  9. @Mike-wk1dm says:
    1 year ago

    The 9th circus is he most overturned court in the country they are activists

    Reply
  10. @carlwalther136 says:
    1 year ago

    That one judge said "BIG caliber magazines". Not what they are arguing here, at all.

    Reply
  11. @D6EH says:
    1 year ago

    These leftist activist judges are stalling, in hopes that SCOTUS turns left. The 9th knows what they SHOULD do, but they won’t.

    Reply
  12. @boltfan36 says:
    1 year ago

    These judges must think that the Supreme Court justices do not hold a full grasp of the English language. I know they said and, but I am pretty sure they meant or… maybe they just forgot to add a comma…

    Reply
  13. @danmiller7079 says:
    1 year ago

    Just a bunch of rambling judges who don’t respect or protect the Constitution of the state or Country. They should recuse themselves, not that they would, for not knowing excrement about firearms. Just being activists in black robes.

    Reply
  14. @eusebiotravissevilla6508 says:
    1 year ago

    Mass non compliance is what’s needed.

    Reply
  15. @eusebiotravissevilla6508 says:
    1 year ago

    These judges should not have to ask questions in settled law at the highest court. Fools.

    Reply
  16. @rlogan9562 says:
    1 year ago

    Why aren't these judges and elected government officials not being put in jail for not upholding the laws and for breaking the laws??? These individuals need to be removed from their official duties that we have entrusted within them and jailed. FULL STOP!!!

    Reply
  17. @petepan9666 says:
    1 year ago

    I wonder if those judges honor their ten round policy. Seems like an angry mob could easily prove them wrong.

    Reply
  18. @427stulman says:
    1 year ago

    Like I always say.. If we can not defeat it here in Comifornia. It will be coming to a state near you.

    Reply
  19. @cjcj5050 says:
    1 year ago

    Does the 2nd amendment protect this?

    picks up random object

    These people are clueless no point in listening to delusional politicians

    Reply
  20. @wildpigremovalinc.executio8028 says:
    1 year ago

    My opinion, the judges are of academia. I would guess many of them or all of them are not sportsman. They know very little about firearms or how they work. Except someone pulls a trigger and it goes bang. My guess is part of the reason they were asking questions is because of their lack of knowledge. My 2 cents.

    Reply
  21. @REBEL1-16 says:
    1 year ago

    Awesome so no real update

    Reply
  22. @aroyyotoad1345 says:
    1 year ago

    More hearings like this should be televised, because I don't think the average person understands how out of touch and ill-informed most judges are on the things they are making judgment on. They make things up and misuse terms, all the time. Its baffling every time I watch something like this

    Reply
  23. @mikeperez2623 says:
    1 year ago

    They won’t take it to the Supreme Court because they will lose nd all 50 states will be the same nd that not what there agenda is

    Reply
  24. @MichaelGentry-le9nj says:
    1 year ago

    .. and when California decides that 10 rds are “ too dangerous?”( you only need FIVE ROUNDS For self defense! Canada only allows 5 rounds!!)… then THREE rounds … then single shot only ?….

    Bad enough that California has IGNORED DROS and is pushing an “ annual gun registration” ( or surrender your guns) ….

    Remember ONE Party has ruled CA for nearly 55 years- same party has a vested interest in keeping its residents compliant and docile, same party had a well renowned member working with gangs and the Chinese military to ship guns into the state, while pushing gun control laws meant to disarm honest citizens ! One party that constantly and willfully tries to ignore FEDERAL LAW, one party that is well invested in and receives back door donations from a country and government in the pacific rim that is hostile toward the U.S, one party that thinks it controls what people think and say in CA….

    An unarmed and docile population will be woefully dependent and in fear of that one party for another 50 plus years of people don’t start voting against them….

    Reply
  25. @JoseLuisGonzalez-jv7kj says:
    1 year ago

    Thank you for putting in the work to put this together.

    Reply
  26. @joek5800 says:
    1 year ago

    “A large caliberer magazine” 🤦‍♂️

    Reply
  27. @greatestunknown says:
    1 year ago

    I just wish I could watch your videos without being hounded about subscribing, hitting notifications and the bell. There are other 2A community channels that don't keep nagging us and it is really nice. They just cut right to the chase. Please, please, please! If people want to subscribe, they will do so on their own, we don't need to keep being annoyed.

    Reply
  28. @TheObso1337 says:
    1 year ago

    I think it's absolutely delusional to think that CA would not appeal a loss at this stage. Sure as the sun rises in the morning they will. They will also demand an immediate injunction and a hearing as far down the road as possible.

    This is not because they would win in SCOTUS, but because that way they can continue to stall any resolution of this case and continue to enforce their laws as long as possible. It could give them a chance to stall for more time for a few more anti-2A justices to be appointed, for the court to be packed, or just to be obnoxious and run up legal fees for the plaintiffs.

    Reply
  29. @smokemynatch says:
    1 year ago

    "the intruder" lol

    Reply
  30. @Hondo1015 says:
    1 year ago

    If they side with California that direct deposit is gonna be in their accounts first thing in the morning 😅

    Reply
  31. @blueguardian7934 says:
    1 year ago

    Why are we letting these corrupt old dusty newscum’s minions play ping pong with our rights. Regardless of what these corrupt governor and judges say I will always honor my rights. When they give up there heavily armed police. 24hr protection then so will I.

    Reply
  32. @leoguy1609 says:
    1 year ago

    Tell those liberal judges to stop smoking crack!

    Reply
  33. @generalryan7659 says:
    1 year ago

    Bro I'm gonna be 30 or 40 years old before this is finally over. I'm 21 rn, just gonna move tf out when I can.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to @marccampbell6750 Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CATEGORIES

  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos
No Result
View All Result

LATEST UPDATES

  • LIVE: President Biden’s State of the Union address full coverage
  • Exploring The Pros And Cons Of Using Once Fired Brass And New Brass For Reloading
  • SAF BRIEF SUPPORTS SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION IN WAITING PERIOD CHALLENGE
  • About us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Copyright Š 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • 2nd Amendment
  • Freedom of speech
  • Guns & Ammo
  • Preppers
  • Videos

Copyright Š 2023 - 2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub.
2nd Amendment Alliance News Hub is not responsible for the content of external sites.